Validierung der deutschsprachigen Version der Multidimensional Offline and Online Peer Victimization Scale (MOOPV) für Jugendliche an einer Schülerstichprobe

Zusammenfassung

Peer Viktimisierung (PV) im Jugendalter kann mit psychischen Belastungen über die Lebensspanne hinweg einhergehen. Obwohl eine Vielzahl von Instrumenten zur Erfassung von PV entwickelt wurden, fehlen häufig Evidenzen für deren Einsatz. Besonders bei den Instrumenten zur Erfassung von Cybermobbing fehlen oft psychometrische Berechnungen, wie Faktorenanalysen zur Untersuchung der angenommenen Skalen und Angaben zu Validität und Reliabilität. Die Multidimensional Offline and Online Peer Victimization Scale (MOOPV) von Sumter und Kollegen stellt eine Ausnahme dar, ist aber bisher nur auf Niederländisch verfügbar. Dieser Fragebogen ist nicht mediumspezifisch ausgelegt, hinreichend psychometrisch geprüft und unterschiedet zwischen verschiedenen Formen von direkter und indirekter, online und offline PV. Ziel dieser Studie ist die Präsentation und psychometrische Überprüfung der deutschsprachigen Version der Multidimensional Offline and Online Peer Victimization Scale (MOOPV). Die Faktorenstruktur, Validität und Reliabilität wurde anhand der Daten von 777 SchülerInnen zwischen 10 und 20 Jahren untersucht. Eine konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse stützte das Vier-Faktorenmodell. Die Skalen direkte offline, indirekte offline, direkte online und indirekte online PV weisen gute interne Konsistenzen sowie Konstruktvalidität auf. Somit ist der MOOPV für die Erfassung von PV im Jugendalter für Forschung und Praxis geeignet.

Abstract

Peer victimisation (PV) in childhood and adolescence can come along with psychological stress through the life span. Even though there exist a large number of questionnaires that measure PV, evidence of the use is often missing. Particularly instruments for capturing cyberbullying lack psychometric calculations such as factor analysis for investigating scales and data on validity and reliability. An exception constitutes the Multidimensional Offline and Online Peer Victimization Scale (MOOPV) of Sumter et al., which is only available in Dutch. This questionnaire is not medium-specifically designed, has been psychometrically properly explored, and differentiates between direct and indirect as well as online and offline PV. The present study aims to investigate the psychometric properties of the German version of the Multidimensional Offline and Online Peer Victimization Scale (MOOPV). The factor structure, validity and reliability was examined in a sample of 777 pupils aged 10–20. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the original four-factor model. The scales direct offline, indirect offline, direct online, and indirect online demonstrated high internal reliability and construct validity. The MOOPV can be used as a validated instrument in research and practice to capture PV in childhood and adolescence.

Schlüsselwörter

Peer Viktimisierung - online - offline - Fragebogen - Validierung

Key words

peer victimization - online - offline - questionnaire - validation

• Literatur

• 1 Mietzel G. Wege in die Entwicklungspsychologie: Kindheit und Jugend. Weinheim: Beltz; 2002
• 2 Maniglio R. Bullying and Other Forms of Peer Victimization in Adolescence and Alcohol Use. Trauma Violence Abuse 2017; 18: 457-473
• 3 Arseneault L. Annual Research Review: The persistent and pervasive impact of being bullied in childhood and adolescence: implications for policy and practice. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2018; 59: 405-421
• 4 Maniglio R. Association between peer victimization in adolescence and cannabis use: A systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav 2015; 25: 252-258
• 5 van Geel M, Goemans A, Vedder P. A meta-analysis on the relation between peer victimization and adolescent non-suicidal self-injury. Psychiatry Res 2015; 230: 364-368
• 6 Holt MK, Vivolo-Kantor AM, Polanin JR. et al. Bullying and Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. Pediatrics 2015; 135: e496-e509. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-1864
• 7 DaSilva SM, Keeler C. Adolescent peer victimization and PTSD risk. Adolesc Psychiatry 2017; 7: 25-43
• 8 Ttofi MM, Farrington DP, Lösel F. et al. Do the victims of school bullies tend to become depressed later in life? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Aggress Confl Peace Res 2011; 3: 63-73
• 9 Feierabend S, Plankenhorn T, Rathgeb T. Jugend, Information, (Multi-) Media Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest. 2017. Im Internet: http://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2017/JIM_2017.pdf Stand: 06.06.2019
• 10 Davis K. Friendship 2.0: Adolescentsʼ experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. J Adolesc 2012; 35: 1527-1536
• 11 Gámez-Guadix M, Orue I, Smith PK. et al. Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic internet use among adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2013; 53: 446-452
• 12 Fuchs M, Riedl D, Bock A. et al. Pathological Internet Use – an improtant comorbidity in child and adolescent psychiatry: prevalence and correlation patterns in a naturalistic sample of adolescent inpatients. Bio Med Research International 2018; 18
• 13 González-Cabrera J, León-Mejía A, Beranuy M. et al. Relationship between cyberbullying and health-related quality of life in a sample of children and adolescents. Quality of Life Research 2018; 27: 2609-2618
• 14 Fisher BW, Gardella JH, Teurbe-Tolon AR. Peer Cybervictimization Among Adolescents and the Associated Internalizing and Externalizing Problems: A Meta-Analysis. J Youth Adolesc 2016; 45: 1727-1743
• 15 Waasdorp TE, Bradshaw CP. The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health 2015; 56: 483-488 doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.002
• 16 Gini G, Card NA, Pozzoli T. A meta-analysis of the differential relations of traditional and cyber-victimization with internalizing problems. Aggress Behav 2018; 44: 185-198
• 17 Carbone-Lopez K, Esbensen F-A, Brick BT. Correlates and consequences of peer victimization: Gender differences in direct and indirect forms of bullying. Youth Violence Juv Justice 2010; 8: 332-350
• 18 Casper DM, Card NA. Overt and relational victimization: A meta-analytic review of their overlap and associations with social–psychological adjustment. Child Dev 2017; 88: 466-483
• 19 Stecher N, Bock A, Fleischmann S. et al. Prävalenz und Charakteristika von Mobbingerfahrungen in einer klinischen Stichprobe von Jugendlichen. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother 2018; 47: 323-333 doi:10.1024/1422-4917/a000611 1-11
• 20 Hong JS, Kim DH, Thornberg R. et al. Correlates of direct and indirect forms of cyberbullying victimization involving South Korean adolescents: An ecological perspective. Comput Human Behav 2018; 87: 327-336
• 21 Berne S, Frisén A, Schultze-Krumbholz A. et al. Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav 2013; 18: 320-334
• 22 Sumter SR, Valkenburg PM, Baumgartner SE. et al. Development and validation of the Multidimensional Offline and Online Peer Victimization Scale. Comput Human Behav 2015; 46: 114-122
• 23 WHO. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Im Internet: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/ Stand: 08.06.2019
• 24 LimeSurvey. An Open Source survey tool. Hamburg: LimeSurveyGmbH; 2017
• 25 Ravens-Sieberer U, Bullinger M. Assessing health related quality of life in chronically ill children with the German KINDL: first psychometric and content-analytical results. Quality of Life Research 1998; 7: 399-407
• 26 Ravens-Sieberer U, Bullinger M. News from the KINDL-Questionnaire – A new version for adolescents. Quality of Life Research 1998; 7: 653
• 27 Ravens-Sieberer U, Gosch A, Rajmil L. et al. KIDSCREEN-52 quality-of-life measure for children and adolescents. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2005; 5: 353-364
• 28 Tagay S, Düllmann S, Hermans E. et al. Das Essener Trauma-Inventar für Kinder und Jugendliche (ETI-KJ). Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother 2011; 39: 323-340
• 29 Weiber R, Mühlhaus D. Strukturgleichungsmodellierung. Heidelberg: Springer; 2014