Endoscopy 2019; 51(10): E299-E300
DOI: 10.1055/a-0915-1785
E-Videos
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Retrieval of a large resected specimen using a large-caliber cap after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Yuichiro Kuroki
Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Kunio Asonuma
Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Natsumi Uehara
Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Toshiyuki Endo
Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Reika Suzuki
Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Yorimasa Yamamoto
Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Masatsugu Nagahama
Department of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 May 2019 (online)

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has emerged as a feasible treatment option for colorectal tumors [1]. However, large colorectal specimens obtained via ESD that are difficult to retrieve from the anal canal are often encountered. We have experienced a few cases of specimen fragmentation during retrieval. Precise histological evaluation requires an intact specimen and fragmentation should be avoided. Several recent reports have described useful techniques for the retrieval of intact resected specimens [2] [3] [4]; however, these reported methods are relatively complex. We describe a more convenient and easy way of retrieving resected specimens using a large-caliber cap. 

The first case involves a 73-year-old man who underwent ESD for a large laterally spreading tumor (LST) located in the rectosigmoid colon ([Fig. 1 a]). We removed the tumor via en bloc resection using a DualKnife (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and a short-type small-caliber-tip transparent cap (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Because the resected specimen measured over 10 cm, its retrieval from the anal canal was very difficult. Therefore, a large-caliber (outer diameter 18 mm) oblique soft cap (D-206; Olympus) for cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection [5] was placed on the tip of the endoscope ([Fig. 2]). We suctioned the resected specimen into the cap and retrieved it easily from the anal canal ([Fig. 1 b], [Video 1]). Because the cap could pass through the anal canal while protecting the resected specimen, the resected specimen did not fragment. Precise histological evaluation revealed negative margins.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Large tumor located in the rectosigmoid colon. a Overview of the tumor. b The cap is a large-caliber device; however, it can be inserted easily through the anal canal because the cap is transparent, oblique, and soft.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Large-caliber (outer diameter 18 mm) oblique soft cap (D-206; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was placed on the tip of the endoscope.

Video 1 Retrieval of a large resected specimen using a large-caliber cap after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.


Quality:

The second case involved a 68-year-old man who underwent ESD for a large LST located in the upper rectum ([Fig. 3 a]). The tumor was removed via en bloc resection, and was easily retrieved using the same method as that described above ([Fig. 3 b], [Video 1]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Large tumor located in the upper rectum. a Overview of the tumor. b Resected specimen. Histological evaluation revealed that the cut margins were negative for intramucosal cancer.

Since 2014, we have used this method to successfully retrieve specimens measuring over 50 mm without fragmentation, regardless of tumor shape.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high
quality video and all contributions are
freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission
website at
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos

 
  • References

  • 1 Saito Y, Yamada M, So E. et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: technical advantages compared to endoscopic mucosal resection and minimally invasive surgery. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 52-61
  • 2 Ikehara H, Saito Y, Uraoka T. et al. Specimen retrieval method using a sliding overtube for large colorectal neoplasm following endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2015; 47: E168-E169
  • 3 Nemoto D, Hayashi Y, Utano K. et al. A novel retrieval technique for large colorectal tumors resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection: tumor extraction by defecation. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E93-E95
  • 4 Tanaka S, Toyonaga T, East J. et al. Endoscopic retrieval method using a small grip-seal plastic bag for large colorectal resection specimens after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2010; 42: E186-E187
  • 5 Inoue H, Endo M, Takeshita K. et al. A new simplified technique of endoscopic esophageal mucosal resection using a cap-fitted panendoscope (EMRC). Surg Endosc 1992; 6: 264-265