Arthritis und Rheuma 2019; 39(02): 95-104
DOI: 10.1055/a-0883-0804
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Kortison-Injektionen an der Wirbelsäule (periartikulär, nervennah, epidural)

Spinal steroid injections (periarticular, periradicular, epidural)
Fidaa Jablawi
1   Neurochirurgische Klinik, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
,
Karsten Schöller
1   Neurochirurgische Klinik, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 May 2019 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Wirbelsäulennahe Kortison-Injektionen gehören zu den heutzutage am weitesten verbreiteten medizinischen Prozeduren überhaupt. Durch die epidurale, intra- und periartikuläre Applikation der Steroide sollen inflammatorisch getriggerte, therapieresistente Schmerzen von nozizeptivem und neuropathischem Charakter beeinflusst werden.

Auch wenn das Risiko der Infiltrationen insgesamt gering ist, wurden Fälle mit schweren neurologischen Komplikationen wie z. B. nach zervikalen, epiduralen transforaminalen Injektionen beschrieben. Insgesamt scheint das Risikoprofil nicht kristalliner Steroide wie dem Dexamethason bei allenfalls geringgradig niedrigerer Effektivität im Vergleich mit den häufig gebrauchten kristallinen Steroiden günstiger zu sein.

Die wissenschaftliche Evidenz zur Effektivität der verschiedenen wirbelsäulennahen Steroidinfiltrationen steht in einem starken Kontrast zu deren häufigen Anwendungen. Sämtliche Techniken der Steroid-Applikation haben einen limitierten Nutzen bei lokalen Schmerzen, die beste Evidenz für eine kurzfristige Schmerzlinderung besteht für die epidurale Steroidinfiltration bei radikulären Schmerzen.

Summary

Spinal corticosteroid injections are nowadays one of the most commonly performed procedures in medicine. Epidural, intraand periarticular applications of steroids aim at nociceptive and neuropathic pain that is triggered by inflammatory stimuli. Even though the overall risk of spinal infiltrations is low, cases with severe neurological complications have been reported in the literature, e. g. after cervical transforaminal injections. Furthermore, there are concerns over the safety profile of particulate steroids which has to be weighed against a, at best, slightly higher efficacy.

The scientific evidence of the spinal steroid infiltrations stands against its common use. Efficacy is limited in back pain and the best evidence (Level II) exists for short-term control of radiculopathy by epidural injections.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Juniper M. et al. The epidemiology, economic burden, and pharmacological treatment of chronic low back pain in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK: a literature-based review.. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2009; 10: 2581-2592
  • 2 Cohen SP. et al. Epidural steroids A comprehensive, evidence-based review.. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 10: 1-5
  • 3 Manchikanti L. et al. Retrospective cohort study of usage patterns of epidural injections for spinal pain in the US fee-forservice Medicare population from 2000 to 2014.. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e013042
  • 4 Makkar JK. et al. Particulate vs Non-Particulate Steroids for Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Current Literature.. Pain Physician 2016; 19: 327-340
  • 5 Boswell MV. et al. Interventional techniques: Evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain.. Pain physician 2007; 10: 7-111
  • 6 White AH. et al. Epidural injections for the diagnosis and treatment of low-back pain.. Spine 1980; 5: 78-86
  • 7 Renfrew DL. et al. Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: Fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration. AJNR.. American journal of neuroradiology 1991; 12: 1003-1007
  • 8 Schmid G. et al. Effective dose of CT- and fluoroscopy-guided perineural/epidural injections of the lumbar spine: A comparative study.. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2006; 29: 84-91
  • 9 Johnson BA. et al. Epidurography and therapeutic epidural injections: Technical considerations and experience with 5334 cases. AJNR.. American journal of neuroradiology 1999; 20: 697-705
  • 10 Carette S. et al. Epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus.. The New England journal of medicine 1997; 336: 1634-1640
  • 11 Silbergleit R. et al. Imaging-guided injection techniques with fluoros-copy and CT for spinal pain management.. Radiographics 2001; 21: 927-939 discussion 940–922
  • 12 Arden NK. et al. A multicentre randomized controlled trial of epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica: The west study.. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005; 44: 1399-1406
  • 13 Bush K, Hillier S. A controlled study of caudal epidural injections of triamcinolone plus procaine for the management of intractable sciatica.. Spine 1991; 16: 572-575
  • 14 Dilke TF. et al. Extradural corticosteroid injection in management of lumbar nerve root compression.. British medical journal 1973; 2: 635-637
  • 15 Bush K, Hillier S. Outcome of cervical radiculopathy treated with periradicular/epidural corticosteroid injections: A prospective study with independent clinical review.. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 1996; 5: 319-325
  • 16 Goodman BS. et al. Complications and pitfalls of lumbar interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injections.. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2008; 1: 212-222
  • 17 Manchikanti L. et al. Preliminary results of a randomized, equivalence trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain: Part 4-spinal stenosis.. Pain physician 2008; 11: 833-848
  • 18 Watters III WC. et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 13: Injection therapies, low-back pain, and lumbar fusion.. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 21: 79-90
  • 19 Boswell MV. et al. Interventional techniques: Evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain.. Pain physician 2007; 10: 7-111
  • 20 Carette S. et al. A controlled trial of corticosteroid injections into facet joints for chronic low back pain.. The New England journal of medicine 1991; 325: 1002-1007
  • 21 Manchikanti L. et al. Lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic facet joint pain: One-year follow-up of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: Clinical trial nct00355914.. Pain physician 2008; 11: 121-132
  • 22 Rosenberg JM. et al. Computerized tomographic localization of clinically-guided sacroiliac joint injections.. Clin J Pain 2000; 16: 18-21
  • 23 Luukkainen RK. et al. Efficacy of periarticular corticosteroid treatment of the sacroiliac joint in non-spondylarthropathic patients with chronic low back pain in the region of the sacroiliac joint.. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2002; 20: 52-54
  • 24 Borowsky CD, Fagen G. Sources of sacroiliac region pain: Insights gained from a study comparing standard intra-articular injection with a technique combining intra- and peri-articular injection.. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 2048-2056
  • 25 Simopoulos T. et al. Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Therapeutic Effectiveness of Sacroiliac Joint Interventions.. Pain Physician 2015; 18: 713-756
  • 26 Abraham G. et al. Comparison of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis susceptibility upon single-dose i. m. depot versus long-acting i. v. triamcinolone acetonide therapy: a direct pharmacokinetic correlation.. J Endocrinol 2006; 191: 491-496
  • 27 Benzon HT . et al. Comparison of the particle sizes of different steroids and the effect of dilution: a review of the relative neurotoxicities of the steroids.. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 331-338
  • 28 Tiso RL. et al. Adverse central nervous system sequelae after selective transforaminal block: the role of corticosteroids.. J Spine 2004; 4: 468-474
  • 29 Engel A. et al. The Effectiveness and Risks of Fluoroscopically Guided Cervical Transforaminal Injections of Steroids: A Systematic Review with Comprehensive Analysis of the Published Data.. Pain Med (United States) 2014; 15: 386-402
  • 30 U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Meeting of the Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Products Advisory Committee Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) and the Risk of Serious Neurologic Adverse Reactions.. (November 2014) Im Internet: www.fda Stand: 24.11.2017
  • 31 Besler S. et al. Is there a difference in treatment outcomes between epidural injections with particulate versus non-particulate steroids?. European Radiology 2017; 27: 1505-1511
  • 32 Feeley IH. et al. Particulate and non-particulate steroids in spinal epidurals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur.. Spine 2017; 26: 336-344
  • 33 Schott H. Wirbelsäulennahes Kortison: Stand der Dinge für die Praxis.. Im Blickpunkt 2016; 19: 2012-2016
  • 34 McGrath JM. et al. Incidence and characteristics of complications from epidural steroid injections.. Pain Med 2011; 12: 726-731