Endoscopist’s occupational dose evaluation related to correct wearing of dosimeter during X-ray-guided procedures

Abstract

Background Since endoscopists performing procedures in the endoscopy suite can change their position by turning their back, side or front toward the X-ray source, this study aimed to establish whether dosimeter position affects the correct evaluation of an endoscopist’s personal radiation exposure during X-ray-guided procedures.

Materials and methods Between January and February 2018, two dosimeters specularly placed outside the lead apron (anterior one on the chest and posterior one on the back) measured endoscopists’ personal dose equivalent (Hp) during 62 X-ray-guided procedures on adult and pediatric patients. Procedures were divided into three groups considering the position taken by the endoscopist with respect to the radiation source. For each group, the difference between mean Hp from the anterior and posterior dosimeters was calculated.

Results A statistically significant difference in mean Hp was recorded for the endoscopists’ frontal and back positions (P = 0.014, and P < 0.00001, respectively). No significant difference was found in mean Hp for the side position (P = 0.489).

Conclusions The position of personal dosimeters affects the correct evaluation of endoscopists’ radiation exposure during X-ray-guided procedures when frontal and back positions were recorded. To correctly evaluate radiation doses, the whole-body dosimeter should be worn according to the position of the endoscopist with respect to the radiation source; otherwise, it results in an incorrect personal dose evaluation, which may lead to substantial underestimation of staff exposure.

• References

• 1 Mekaroonkamol P, Keilin S. Editorial: ERCP-related radiation cataractogenesis: Is it time to be concerned?. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112: 722-724
• 2 Staniszewska MA, Kujawski K, Kopeć R. et al. ERCP procedures as a source of radiation risk to a single gastroenterologist. Med Pr 2017; 68: 735-741
• 3 Seo D, Kim KH, Kim JS. et al. Evaluation of radiation doses in patient and medical staff during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures. Radiat Prot Dosim 2016; 168: 516-522
• 4 Cohen RV, Aldred MA, Paes WS. et al. How safe is ERCP to the endoscopist?. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 615-617
• 5 Minami T, Sasaki T, Serikawa M. et al. Occupational radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and usefulness of radiation protective curtains. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014; 2014: 926876
• 6 Tsapaki V, Paraskeva KD, Mathou N. et al. Patient and endoscopist radiation doses during ERCP procedures. Radiat Prot Dosim 2011; 147: 111-113
• 7 Buls N, Pages J, Mana F. et al. Patient and staff exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Br J Radiol 2002; 75: 435-443
• 8 Naidu LS, Singhal S, Preece DE. et al. Radiation exposure to personnel performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Postgrad Med J 2005; 81: 660-662
• 9 Sulieman A, Paroutoglou G, Kapsoritakis A. et al. Reduction of radiation doses to patients and staff during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 23-29
• 10 World Gastroenterology Organization Practice Guideline: Radiation Protection in the Endoscopy Suite. Introduction: Minimizing radiation exposure for patients and staff in endoscopy: a Joint ASGE/IAEA/WGO Guideline. 2009 [Available at: http://www.worldgastroenterology.org/guidelines/global-guidelines/radiation-protection-in-the-endoscopy-suite]
• 11 Tsapaki V, Paraskeva KD, Tsalafoutas IA. et al. The impact of x-ray unit type used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures on patient doses. Radiat Prot Dosim 2016; 171: 503-508
• 12 Lopez PO, Dauer LT, Loose R. et al. ICRP Publication 139: Occupational radiological protection in interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 2018; 47: 1-118
• 13 Chida K, Kaga Y, Haga Y. et al. Occupational dose in interventional radiology procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: 138-141
• 14 Zankl M. Personal dose equivalent for photons and its variation with dosimeter position. Health Phys 1999; 76: 162-170
• 15 Degiorgio S, Gerasia R, Liotta F. et al. Radiation doses to operators in hepatobiliary interventional procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41: 772-780
• 16 Omar A, Marteinsdottir M, Kadesjo N. et al. On the feasibility of utilizing active personal dosimeters worn on the chest to estimate occupational eye lens dose in x-ray angiography. J Radiol Prot 2015; 35: 271-284 [Epub 2015 Mar 18 PubMed PMID: 25785566]