Background and study aims Scarred polyps are challenging to resect using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of the EndoRotor device in resecting scarred polyps arising from previous endoscopic resection attempts.
Patients and methods This was a prospective pilot study of patients with scarred colonic polyps treated using EndoRotor carried out in two centers.
Results A total of 19 patients were included in this study. The overall cure rate using EndoRotor was 84 %; 10 patients (52.6 %) achieved cure after one attempt and six patients (31.5 %) achieved cure after two attempts. A total of three patients who had polyp recurrence after the first EndoRotor resection were referred for either endoscopic submucosal dissection (2 patients) or surgery (1 patient) due to difficult access. There were no perforations, delayed bleeding, post-polypectomy syndrome or complications requiring surgery.
Conclusions In this pilot study, the novel non-thermal device (EndoRotor) has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective technique in challenging management of scarred polyps. Further randomized controlled trials comparing this technique with APC, hot avulsion, ESD and endoscopic full-thickness resection are required to ascertain the utility of EndoRotor in the hands of non-expert endoscopists.
1
Moss A,
Williams SJ,
Hourigan LF.
et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 2015; 64: 57-65
2
Knabe M,
Pohl J,
Gerges C.
et al. Standardized long-term follow-up after endoscopic resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a prospective two-center study. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 183-189
3
Hollerbach S,
Wellmann A,
Meier P.
et al. The EndoRotor®: endoscopic mucosal resection system for non-thermal and rapid removal of esophageal, gastric, and colonic lesions: initial experience in live animals. Endosc Int Open 2016; 04: E475-E479
4
Knabe M,
Blößer S,
Wetzka J.
et al. Non-thermal ablation of non-neoplastic Barrett’s esophagus with the novel EndoRotor® resection device. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2018; 5: 678-683
5
Holmes I,
Kim HG,
Yang D-H.
et al. Avulsion is superior to argon plasma coagulation for treatment of visible residual neoplasia during EMR of colorectal polyps (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 822-829
6
Tate D,
Bahin F,
Desomer L.
et al. Cold-forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare-tip soft coagulation (CAST) is an effective and safe strategy for the management of non-lifting large laterally spreading colonic lesions. Endoscopy 2017; 50: 52-62
7
Pimentel-Nunes P,
Dinis-Ribeiro M,
Ponchon T.
et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 829-854
8
Aepli P,
Criblez D,
Baumeler S.
et al. Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) of colorectal neoplasms with the Full Thickness Resection Device (FTRD): Clinical experience from two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2018; 6: 463-470
