Download PDF
neuroreha 2019; 11(01): 25-32
DOI: 10.1055/a-0829-5661
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die Schlaganfallrehabilitation der Zukunft voranbringen: Was sind die nächsten Schritte?

Übersetzung von Jan Mehrholz
Gert Kwakkel
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 March 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Gute Theorien sind die Grundlage für adäquate restaurative Therapien. Präzise Antworten und fundierte Erkenntnisse über die Mechanismen, die wir mit unseren Rehabilitationstherapien beeinflussen wollen, spielen eine Schlüsselrolle für adäquate restaurative Therapien.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 ATTEND Collaborative Group. Family-led rehabilitation after stroke in India (ATTEND): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 390 (10094): 588-599 doi:10.1016/S0140–6736(17)31447–2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 AVERT Trial Collaboration Group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 386 (9988): 46-55 doi:10.1016/S0140–6736(15)60690–0. Epub 2015 Apr 16. Erratum in: Lancet 20154; 386(9988): 30. Erratum in: Lancet 2017; 389(10082): 1884
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Balbinot G, Schuch CP, Jeffers MS. et al. Post-stroke kinematic analysis in rats reveals similar reaching abnormalities as humans. Sci Rep 2018; 8 (01) 8738 doi:10.1038/s41598–018–27101–0
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bernhardt J, Borschmann K, Boyd L. et al. Moving rehabilitation research forward: Developing consensus statements for rehabilitation and recovery research. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31 (08) 694-698 doi:10.1177/1545968317724290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G. et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31 (09) 793-799 doi:10.1177/1545968317732668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Boyd LA, Hayward KS, Ward NS. et al. Biomarkers of stroke recovery: Consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31 (10/11) 864-876 doi:10.1177/1545968317732680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Buma F, Kwakkel G, Ramsey N. Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2013; 31 (06) 707-722 doi:10.3233/RNN-130332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Buurke JH, Nene AV, Kwakkel G. et al. Recovery of gait after stroke: hat changes?. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22 (06) 676-683 doi:10.1177/1545968308317972
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Campbell BCV, Majoie CBLM, Albers GW. et al. Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: A meta-analysis of individual patient-level data. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18 (01) 46-55 doi:10.1016/S1474–4422(18)30314–4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Corbett D, Carmichael ST, Murphy TH. et al. Enhancing the alignment of the preclinical and clinical stroke recovery research pipeline: Consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable translational working group. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31 (08) 699-707 doi:10.1177/1545968317724285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman AL. et al. Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2011; 364 (21) 2026-2036 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1010790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Geurts AC, de Haart M, van Nes IJ. et al. A review of standing balance recovery from stroke. Gait Posture 2005; 22 (03) 267-281 Epub 2004 Dec 7. Review. PubMed PMID: 16214666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jolkkonen J, Kwakkel G. Translational hurdles in stroke recovery studies. Transl Stroke Res 2016; 7 (04) 331-342 doi:10.1007/s12975–016–0461-y
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D. et al. Getting neurorehabilitation right: What can be learned from animal models?. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 26 (08) 923-931 doi:10.1177/1545968312440745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Krakauer JW, Cortés JC. A non-task-oriented approach based on high-dose playful movement exploration for rehabilitation of the upper limb early after stroke: A proposal. NeuroRehabilitation 2018; 43 (01) 31-40 doi: 10.3233/NRE-172411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: Facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22 (03/05) 281-299 Review. PubMed PMID: 15502272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE. et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14 (02) 224-234 doi:10.1016/S1474–4422(14)70160–7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kwakkel G, Winters C, van Wegen EE. Effects of unilateral upper limb training in two distinct prognostic groups early after stroke: The EXPLICIT-stroke randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2016; 30 (09) 804-816 doi:10.1177/1545968315624784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K. et al. Consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31 (09) 784-792 doi:10.1177/1545968317732662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377 (9778): 1693-702 doi:10.1016/S0140–6736(11)60325–5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2014; 45 (07) 2053-2058 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Saposnik G, Cohen LG, Mamdani M. et al. Efficacy and safety of non-immersive virtual reality exercising in stroke rehabilitation (EVREST): A randomised, multicentre, single-blind, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15 (10) 1019-1027 doi:10.1016/S1474–4422(16)30121–1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Saver JL. Time is brain-quantified. Stroke 2006; 37 (01) 263-266 Epub 2005 Dec 8. PubMed PMID: 16339467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A. et al. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2016; 316 (12) 1279-1288 doi:10.1001/jama.2016.13647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Stinear CM. Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: Advances in biomarkers. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16 (10) 826-836 doi:10.1016/S1474–4422(17)30283–1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Thibaut AM, Gauberti M, Ali C. et al. The role of plasminogen activators in stroke treatment: Fibrinolysis and beyond. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17 (12) 1121-1132 doi:10.1016/S1474–4422(18)30323–5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Thieme H, Morkisch N, Mehrholz J. et al. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 7: CD008449 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008449
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 van Kordelaar J, van Wegen EE, Nijland RH. et al. Understanding adaptive motor control of the paretic upper limb early poststroke: The EXPLICIT-stroke program. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27 (09) 854-863 doi:10.1177/1545968313496327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R. et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9 (02) e87987 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Veerbeek JM, Winters C, van Wegen EEH. et al. Is the proportional recovery rule applicable to the lower limb after a first-ever ischemic stroke?. PLoS One 2018; 13 (01) e0189279 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Walker MF, Hoffmann TC, Brady MC. et al. Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: Consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31 (10/11) 877-884 doi: 10.1177/1545968317732686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ward NS. Restoring brain function after stroke: Bridging the gap between animals and humans. Nat Rev Neurol 2017; 13 (04) 244-255 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Winstein CJ, Wolf SL, Dromerick AW. et al. Effect of a task-oriented rehabilitation program on upper extremity recovery following motor stroke: The ICARE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 315 (06) 571-581 doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Winstein C, Varghese R. Been there, done that, so what’s next for arm and hand rehabilitation in stroke?. NeuroRehabilitation 2018; 43 (01) 3-18 doi:10.3233/NRE-172412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Winters C, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EEH. et al. Moving stroke rehabilitation forward: The need to change research. NeuroRehabilitation 2018; 43 (01) 19-30 doi:10.3233/NRE-172393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP. et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296 (17) 2095-2104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar