Rofo 2019; 191(08): 716-724
DOI: 10.1055/a-0775-2544
Academic Radiology
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the body in vascular patients: prevalence and significance of unsuspected extravascular findings

Präoperative computertomografische Angiografie (CTA) des Rumpfes von Patienten der Gefäßchirurgie: Prävalenz und Signifikanz unerwarteter extravaskulärer Befunde
Larissa Sarah Turowski
1   Radiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
Marco Dollinger
1   Radiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
Walter A. Wohlgemuth
2   Radiology, University-Medical-Center Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany
,
Moritz Wildgruber
3   Department of Clinical Radiology, University-Medical-Center Münster, Münster, Germany
,
Lukas Philipp Beyer
1   Radiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
Karin Pfister
4   Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University-Medical-Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
Christian Stroszczynski
1   Radiology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
,
René Müller-Wille
5   Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 June 2018

24 October 2018

Publication Date:
31 January 2019 (online)

Abstract

Purpose Evaluation of the prevalence and significance of unsuspected extravascular findings on computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the body before endovascular or surgical treatment in vascular patients.

Materials and Methods This study was approved by the local institutional review board. Radiology reports of 806 patients who underwent CTA of the body during January 2004 until December 2014 before endovascular or surgical treatment of vascular diseases were retrospectively reviewed. All unexpected extravascular abnormalities were classified as clinically non-significant (requiring no follow-up) or clinically significant (requiring further follow-up/immediate treatment). The course of patients with significant extravascular findings was retrospectively evaluated.

Results Overall 806 patients were included in this study (592 men; mean age: 67 years). In 778 (96.5 %) of 806 patients 3293 incidental extravascular findings were diagnosed. There were 259 suspicious findings in 205 patients (25.4 %) that required further follow-up or immediate treatment. A previously unknown malignant tumor was diagnosed in 23 (2.9 %) patients. 10 patients (1.2 %) were diagnosed with lung cancer. Malignant tumors were detected more often in men than in women (3.5 % versus 0.9 %). Patients with an incidental tumor were significantly older than patients without a tumor (mean age: 72.3 vs. 67.5 years).

Conclusion Clinically significant unexpected extravascular findings are common in vascular patients. Especially noteworthy are malignant tumors of the lung.

Key points

  • Clinically relevant extravascular findings were detected in 25.4 % of the patients.

  • The incidence of malignant tumors was 2.9 %.

  • Lung cancer had the highest incidence among all malignancies (1.2 %).

Citation Format

  • Turowski LS, Dollinger M, Wohlgemuth WA et al. Preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the body in vascular patients: prevalence and significance of unsuspected extravascular findings. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2019; 191: 716 – 724

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Evaluation der Prävalenz und Signifikanz von unerwarteten extravaskulären Befunden in Ganzkörper-computertomografischen Angiografie-Scans (CTA) vor endovaskulärer oder chirurgischer Behandlung von Gefäßpatienten.

Material und Methoden Diese Studie wurde von der örtlichen Ethikkommission genehmigt. Es wurden radiologische Befunde von Patienten, die eine Ganzkörper-CTA im Zeitraum zwischen Januar 2004 und Dezember 2014 vor endovaskulärer oder chirurgischer Therapie von Erkrankungen der Gefäße erhielten, retrospektiv aufgearbeitet. Alle unerwarteten extravaskulären Befunde wurden als klinisch nicht relevant (Verlaufskontrollen nicht indiziert) oder klinisch relevant (Verlaufskontrollen/sofortige Behandlung indiziert) klassifiziert. Der weitere Verlsauf von Patienten mit klinisch relevanten extravaskulären Befunden wurde retrospektiv evaluiert.

Ergebnisse Es wurden 806 Patienten in diese Studie eingeschlossen (592 Männer; Durchschnittsalter 67 Jahre). Bei 778 (96,5 %) von 806 Patienten wurden insgesamt 3293 extravaskuläre Zufallsbefunde festgestellt. Darunter befanden sich 259 suspekte Befunde bei 205 Patienten (25,4 %), die Verlaufskontrollen oder eine sofortige Behandlung erforderten. Ein bis dahin unbekanntes Malignom wurde bei 23 Patienten (2,9 %) diagnostiziert, darunter waren 10 Patienten (1,2 %) mit einem Lungenkarzinom. Bei Männern wurden mehr maligne Tumoren nachgewiesen als bei Frauen (3,5 % versus 0,9 %; p = 0,055; Fisher-Test). Patienten mit einem zufällig entdeckten malignen Tumor waren signifikant älter als Patienten ohne Tumorbefund (Durchschnittsalter 72,3 vs. 67,5 Jahre; p = 0,0432; t-test).

Fazit Klinisch relevante extravaskuläre Zufallsbefunde treten häufig auf bei Gefäßpatienten. Besonders beachtenswert sind maligne Tumoren der Lunge.

Kernaussagen

  • Bei 25,4 % der Patienten wurden klinisch relevante extravaskuläre Zufallsbefunde diagnostiziert.

  • Die Inzidenz maligner Tumoren lag bei 2,9 %.

  • Das Bronchialkarzinom hat unter den Malignomen die höchste Inzidenz (1,2 %).

 
  • References

  • 1 Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM. et al. Management of patients with peripheral artery disease (compilation of 2005 and 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2013; 127: 1425-1443
  • 2 Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G. et al. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery 2011; 41 (Suppl. 01) S1-S58
  • 3 MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM. et al. Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2017; 284: 229-234
  • 4 Israel GM, Bosniak MA. How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiology 2005; 236: 441-450
  • 5 Indes JE, Lipsitz EC, Veith FJ. et al. Incidence and significance of nonaneurysmal-related computed tomography scan findings in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Journal of vascular surgery 2008; 48: 286-290
  • 6 Belgrano M, Pozzi MucelliF, Spadacci A. et al. Prevalence of extravascular collateral findings during 64-slice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower limbs. Radiol Med 2010; 115: 983-996
  • 7 Ben-Dor I, Waksman R, Hanna NN. et al. Utility of radiologic review for noncardiac findings on multislice computed tomography in patients with severe aortic stenosis evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2010; 105: 1461-1464
  • 8 McDougal JL, Valentine RJ, Josephs S. et al. Computed tomographic angiography has added value in patients with vascular disease. Journal of vascular surgery 2006; 44: 998-1001
  • 9 Naidu SG, Hara AK, Brandis AR. et al. Incidence of highly important extravascular findings detected on CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and the lower extremities. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 1630-1634
  • 10 Horton KM, Post WS, Blumenthal RS. et al. Prevalence of significant noncardiac findings on electron-beam computed tomography coronary artery calcium screening examinations. Circulation 2002; 106: 532-534
  • 11 Hunold P, Schmermund A, Seibel RM. et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of accidental findings in electron-beam tomographic scans for coronary artery calcification. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 1748-1758
  • 12 Machaalany J, Yam Y, Ruddy TD. et al. Potential clinical and economic consequences of noncardiac incidental findings on cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1533-1541
  • 13 Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Nakazawa G. et al. Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 402-406
  • 14 Mueller J, Jeudy J, Poston R. et al. Cardiac CT angiography after coronary bypass surgery: prevalence of incidental findings. American journal of roentgenology 2007; 189: 414-419
  • 15 Goitein O, Di Segni E, Eshet Y. et al. Non-Valvular Findings before Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Implantation and their Impact on the Procedure. Isr Med Assoc J 2015; 17: 764-767
  • 16 Gufler H, Schulze CG, Wagner S. Incidental findings in computed tomographic angiography for planning percutaneous aortic valve replacement: advanced age, increased cancer prevalence?. Acta Radiol 2014; 55: 420-426
  • 17 Staab W, Bergau L, Lotz J. et al. Prevalence of noncardiac findings in computed tomography angiography before transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014; 8: 222-229