PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2019; 98(S 01): S253-S289
DOI: 10.1055/a-0740-4866
Referat
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Medizinische Apps in der HNO-Heilkunde

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: deutsch | English
Kristen Rak
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
,
Johannes Völker
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
,
Johannes Taeger
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
,
Andreas Bahmer
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
,
Rudolf Hagen
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
,
Urs-Vito Albrecht
2   Peter L. Reichertz, Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
03. April 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Nutzung mobiler Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie im Kontext medizinscher und gesundheitsnaher Dienstleistungen, z. B. in Form von Apps, gewinnt, leider jedoch häufig unter Missachtung notwendiger Qualitätskriterien, immer mehr an Bedeutung. So erscheint es wichtig, dass neben einer die Anwendungssoftware kontrollierenden Instanz möglichst hoch qualifizierte Akteure des Gesundheitswesens bei der Erstellung mitwirken. Schon aus Haftungsgründen muss der beratende Arzt eine hohe Sorgfalt bei der Auswahl und Empfehlung einer App walten lassen, gerade auch in Anbetracht der Tatsache, dass nur wenige Apps als Medizinprodukt zertifiziert sind. Auf dem Markt gibt es eine große Anzahl an medizinischen Apps, wobei nur ein geringer Anteil dieser auf den Fachbereich HNO-Heilkunde entfällt. Prozentual sind die Teilbereiche Audiologie, Schlafmedizin und Allergologie am häufigsten vertreten. Obwohl sich der Fachbereich der HNO-Heilkunde zunehmend mit dieser Thematik wissenschaftlich auseinandersetzt, fehlt, wie generell bei vielen medizinischen Apps, eine wissenschaftliche Evidenz der Inhalte und Ergebnisse. Es gibt jedoch für Anwender weitere Möglichkeiten, medizinische Apps nach definierten Qualitätskriterien in verschiedenen Kategorien, wie z. B. Funktionalität, Wissenschaftlichkeit, aber auch Datenschutz, zu beurteilen. Keine der mittels eines solchen Bewertungstools evaluierten Apps erfüllte alle geforderten Kriterien, dem Anwender steht jedoch hiermit ein Instrument zur besseren Einschätzung der Anwendungssoftware zur Verfügung. Im Rahmen des Entwicklungsprozesses einer medizinischen App für den HNO-Bereich war es jedoch möglich, die Qualitätskriterien zu berücksichtigen. Zusammenfassend soll die vorliegende Arbeit einen Überblick über Thema „Apps in der HNO-Heilkunde“ ermöglichen mit dem Ziel, dieses moderne Hilfsmittel nutzbringend einsetzen zu können.

Schlüsselwörter

Apps - Chancen - Risiken - Literaturrecherche - Umfrage - App-Entwicklung
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 https://www.bitkom.org
    PubMed
  • 2 Albrecht U-V, Hillebrand U, von Jan U. Relevance of Trust Marks and CE Labels in German-Language Store Descriptions of Health Apps: Analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018; 6: e10394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Deutscher Ärzteverlag GmbH RDÄ. Internisten sichten und klassifizieren Gesundheits-Apps. 2018
    PubMed
  • 4 Albrecht U-V, Kuhn B, Land J. et al. Nutzenbewertung von digitalen Gesundheitsprodukten (Digital Health) im gesellschaftlichen Erstattungskontext. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2018; 61: 340-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jee H. Review of researches on smartphone applications for physical activity promotion in healthy adults. J Exerc Rehabil 2017; 13: 3-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Middelweerd A, van der Laan DM, van Stralen MM. et al. What features do Dutch university students prefer in a smartphone application for promotion of physical activity? A qualitative approach. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015; 12: 31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Albrecht U-V. Chancen und Risiken von Gesundheits-Apps (CHARISMHA); engl. Chances and Risks of Mobile Health Apps (CHARISMHA). Hannover: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover; 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 8 [Anonym]. Medizinproduktegesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 7. August 2002 (BGBl. I S. 3146), das zuletzt durch Artikel 7 des Gesetzes vom 18. Juli 2017 (BGBl. I S. 2757) geändert worden ist. 1994; Im Internet: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/mpg/index.html
    PubMed
  • 9 Europäisches Parlament und R. Richtlinie 2007/47/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates. 2007
    PubMed
  • 10 Pramann O. Kapitel 10. Gesundheits-Apps und Datenschutz. In: Albrecht U-V. (Hrsg.) Chancen und Risiken von Gesundheits-Apps (CHARISMHA), engl Chances and Risks of Mobile Health Apps (CHARISMHA). Hannover: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover; 2016: 214-227
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Pramann O. Kapitel 11. Gesundheits-Apps als Medizinprodukte. In: Albrecht U-V. (Hrsg.) Chancen und Risiken von Gesundheits-Apps (CHARISMHA). Hannover: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover; 2016: 228-243
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Albrecht U-V, Pramann O. Haftungsfragen beim Einsatz von Gesundheits-Apps: Nobody is perfect. Dtsch Arztebl 2018; 115: A-520/B-452/C-452
    PubMed
  • 13 Hahn T. Tinnitus-Counseling: Neuer Selektivvertrag für HNO-Ärzte. HNO-Mitteilungen 2018; DOI: 166-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wolf JA, Moreau JF, Akilov O. et al. Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection. JAMA Dermatol 2013; 149: 422-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Albrecht U-V. Gesundheits-Apps: Fachübergreifende Qualitätskriterien sind unabdingbar. Dtsch Arztebl 2018; 115: A-67/B-61/C-61
    PubMed
  • 16 Larrosa F, Rama-Lopez J, Benitez J. et al. Development and evaluation of an audiology app for iPhone/iPad mobile devices. Acta Otolaryngol 2015; 135: 1119-1127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Livshitz L, Ghanayim R, Kraus C. et al. Application-Based Hearing Screening in the Elderly Population. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2017; 126: 36-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Abu-Ghanem S, Handzel O, Ness L. et al. Smartphone-based audiometric test for screening hearing loss in the elderly. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273: 333-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Corry M, Sanders M, Searchfield GD. The accuracy and reliability of an app-based audiometer using consumer headphones: pure tone audiometry in a normal hearing group. International journal of audiology 2017; 56: 706-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Derin S, Cam OH, Beydilli H. et al. Initial assessment of hearing loss using a mobile application for audiological evaluation. The Journal of laryngology and otology 2016; 130: 248-251
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Masalski M, Kipinski L, Grysinski T. et al. Hearing Tests on Mobile Devices: Evaluation of the Reference Sound Level by Means of Biological Calibration. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18: e130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Masalski M, Grysinski T, Krecicki T. Hearing Tests Based on Biologically Calibrated Mobile Devices: Comparison With Pure-Tone Audiometry. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6: e10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Dewyer NA, Jiradejvong P, Henderson Sabes J. et al. Automated smartphone audiometry: Validation of a word recognition test app. Laryngoscope 2018; 128: 707-712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 [Anonym]. Hearing Check app. Nurs Stand 2016; 30: 31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sethi RKV, Ghanad I, Kanumuri V. et al. Mobile Hearing Testing Applications and the Diagnosis of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Cautionary Tale. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39: e1-e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Saliba J, Al-Reefi M, Carriere JS. et al. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 156: 706-711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bright T, Pallawela D. Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2016; 3: e13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Zamora W, Calafate CT, Cano JC. et al. Accurate Ambient Noise Assessment Using Smartphones. Sensors (Basel) 2017; 17:
    PubMed
  • 29 Kardous CA, Shaw PB. Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2014; 135: EL186-EL192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kardous CA, Shaw PB. Evaluation of smartphone sound measurement applications (apps) using external microphones-A follow-up study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2016; 140: EL327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Neitzel RL, Heikkinen MS, Williams CC. et al. Pilot study of methods and equipment for in-home noise level measurements. Appl Acoust 2015; 102: 1-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Roberts B, Neitzel RL. Using Smart Devices to Measure Intermittent Noise in the Workplace. Noise & health 2017; 19: 58-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Golub JS, Sharma A, Samy RN. A smartphone-optimized web site for conveniently viewing otolaryngology journal abstracts. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 151: 972-975
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hsueh WD, Bent JP, Moskowitz HS. An app to enhance resident education in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope 2017; DOI: DOI: 10.1002/lary.27040.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Khan KM, Evans SS, Bielko SL. et al. Efficacy of technology-based interventions to increase the use of hearing protections among adolescent farmworkers. International journal of audiology 2018; 57: 124-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Paglialonga A, Tognola G, Pinciroli F. Apps for Hearing Science and Care. Am J Audiol 2015; 24: 293-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Samra S, Wu A, Redleaf M. Interactive iPhone/iPad App for Increased Tympanic Membrane Familiarity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2016; 125: 997-1000
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Henry JA, Thielman E, Zaugg T. et al. Development and field testing of a smartphone “App” for tinnitus management. International journal of audiology 2017; 56: 784-792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Noorain Alam M, Gupta M, Munjal S. et al. Efficacy of TRT Using Noise Presentation from Mobile Phone. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 69: 333-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wunderlich R, Stein A, Engell A. et al. Evaluation of iPod-Based Automated Tinnitus Pitch Matching. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2015; 26: 205-212
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Schlee W, Pryss RC, Probst T. et al. Measuring the Moment-to-Moment Variability of Tinnitus: The TrackYourTinnitus Smart Phone App. Front Aging Neurosci 2016; 8: 294
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Probst T, Pryss RC, Langguth B. et al. Outpatient Tinnitus Clinic, Self-Help Web Platform, or Mobile Application to Recruit Tinnitus Study Samples?. Front Aging Neurosci 2017; 9: 113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Hauptmann C, Wegener A, Poppe H. et al. Validation of a Mobile Device for Acoustic Coordinated Reset Neuromodulation Tinnitus Therapy. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2016; 27: 720-731
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Mistry N, Coulson C, George A. endoscope-i: an innovation in mobile endoscopic technology transforming the delivery of patient care in otolaryngology. Expert Rev Med Devices 2017; 14: 913-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Wu CJ, Wu SY, Chen PC. et al. An innovative smartphone-based otorhinoendoscope and its application in mobile health and teleotolaryngology. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Shah MU, Sohal M, Valdez TA. et al. iPhone otoscopes: Currently available, but reliable for tele-otoscopy in the hands of parents?. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 106: 59-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Liu H, Akiki S, Barrowman NJ. et al. Mobile Endoscopy vs Video Tower: A Prospective Comparison of Video Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 155: 575-580
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Moshtaghi O, Sahyouni R, Haidar YM. et al. Smartphone-Enabled Otoscopy in Neurotology/Otology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 156: 554-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Stippig A, Hubers U, Emerich M. Apps in sleep medicine. Sleep Breath 2015; 19: 411-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Cho SW, Wee JH, Yoo S. et al. Effect of Lifestyle Modification Using a Smartphone Application on Obesity With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Short-term, Randomized Controlled Study. Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology 2018; DOI: DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2017.01284.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Nakano H, Hirayama K, Sadamitsu Y. et al. Monitoring sound to quantify snoring and sleep apnea severity using a smartphone: proof of concept. J Clin Sleep Med 2014; 10: 73-78
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Ong AA, Gillespie MB. Overview of smartphone applications for sleep analysis. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 2: 45-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Lorenz CP, Williams AJ. Sleep apps: what role do they play in clinical medicine?. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2017; 23: 512-516
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Camacho M, Robertson M, Abdullatif J. et al. Smartphone apps for snoring. The Journal of laryngology and otology 2015; 129: 974-979
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Baron KG, Duffecy J, Reid K. et al. Technology-Assisted Behavioral Intervention to Extend Sleep Duration: Development and Design of the Sleep Bunny Mobile App. JMIR Ment Health 2018; 5: e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Siau RTK, Goswamy J, Jones S. et al. Is OperaVOX a clinically useful tool for the assessment of voice in a general ENT clinic?. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2017; 17: 4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Grillo EU. An Online Telepractice Model for the Prevention of Voice Disorders in Vocally Healthy Student Teachers Evaluated by a Smartphone Application. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2017; 2: 63-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Mat Baki M, Wood G, Alston M. et al. Reliability of OperaVOX against Multidimensional Voice Program (MDVP). Clin Otolaryngol 2015; 40: 22-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Manfredi C, Lebacq J, Cantarella G. et al. Smartphones Offer New Opportunities in Clinical Voice Research. J Voice 2017; 31: 111 e111-111 e117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Brodsky JR, Cusick BA, Kawai K. et al. Peripheral vestibular loss detected in pediatric patients using a smartphone-based test of the subjective visual vertical. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 79: 2094-2098
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Organ B, Liu H, Bromwich M. An iPhone-assisted particle repositioning maneuver for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV): a prospective randomized study. J Am Board Fam Med 2015; 28: 118-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Whittaker M, Mathew A, Kanani R. et al. Assessing the Unterberger test: introduction of a novel smartphone application. The Journal of laryngology and otology 2014; 128: 958-960
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Constantinescu G, Loewen I, King B. et al. Designing a Mobile Health App for Patients With Dysphagia Following Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2017; 4: e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Starmer HM, Abrams R, Webster K. et al. Feasibility of a Mobile Application to Enhance Swallowing Therapy for Patients Undergoing Radiation-Based Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer. Dysphagia 2018; 33: 227-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Lopez EA, Costa OA, Ferrari DV. Development and Technical Validation of the Mobile Based Assistive Listening System: A Smartphone-Based Remote Microphone. Am J Audiol 2016; 25: 288-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Maidment DW, Barker AB, Xia J. et al. Effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids for adults with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e011683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Ng SL, Phelan S, Leonard M. et al. A Qualitative Case Study of Smartphone-Connected Hearing Aids: Influences on Patients, Clinicians, and Patient-Clinician Interactions. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2017; 28: 506-521
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Panahi I, Kehtarnavaz N, Thibodeau L. Smartphone-based noise adaptive speech enhancement for hearing aid applications. Conference proceedings : Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2016; 2016: 85–88
    PubMed
  • 69 Reddy CK, Yiya H, Panahi I. Two microphones spectral-coherence based speech enhancement for hearing aids using smartphone as an assistive device. Conference proceedings : Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2016; 2016: 3670–3673
    PubMed
  • 70 Reddy CKA, Shankar N, Bhat GS. et al. An individualized super-Gaussian single microphone Speech Enhancement for hearing aid users with smartphone as an assistive device. IEEE Signal Process Lett 2017; 24: 1601-1605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Yu R, Yiya H, Panahi IM et al. Smartphone-based real-time speech enhancement for improving hearing aids speech perception. Conference proceedings : Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2016; 2016: 5885–5888
    PubMed
  • 72 Kessel KA, Vogel MM, Kessel C. et al. Mobile Health in Oncology: A Patient Survey About App-Assisted Cancer Care. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017; 5: e81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Gomes MS, Bonan PR, Ferreira VY. et al. Development of a mobile application for oral cancer screening. Technol Health Care 2017; 25: 187-195
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Duman-Lubberding S, van Uden-Kraan CF, Jansen F. et al. Feasibility of an eHealth application “OncoKompas” to improve personalized survivorship cancer care. Support Care Cancer 2016; 24: 2163-2171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Klimek L, Bergmann KC, Biedermann T. et al. Visual analogue scales (VAS): Measuring instruments for the documentation of symptoms and therapy monitoring in cases of allergic rhinitis in everyday health care: Position Paper of the German Society of Allergology (AeDA) and the German Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), ENT Section, in collaboration with the working group on Clinical Immunology, Allergology and Environmental Medicine of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNOKHC). Allergo J Int 2017; 26: 16-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Caimmi D, Baiz N, Tanno LK. et al. Validation of the MASK-rhinitis visual analogue scale on smartphone screens to assess allergic rhinitis control. Clin Exp Allergy 2017; 47: 1526-1533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Bousquet J, Devillier P, Arnavielhe S. et al. Treatment of allergic rhinitis using mobile technology with real-world data: The MASK observational pilot study. Allergy 2018; DOI: DOI: 10.1111/all.13406.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Bousquet J, Bewick M, Arnavielhe S. et al. Work productivity in rhinitis using cell phones: The MASK pilot study. Allergy 2017; 72: 1475-1484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Bourret R, Bousquet J, Mercier J. et al. MASK-rhinitis, a single tool for integrated care pathways in allergic rhinitis. World Hosp Health Serv 2015; 51: 36-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Bianchi A, Tsilochristou O, Gabrielli F. et al. The Smartphone: A Novel Diagnostic Tool in Pollen Allergy?. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2016; 26: 204-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Fiedler L, Obleser J, Lunner T et al. Ear-EEG allows extraction of neural responses in challenging listening scenarios – A future technology for hearing aids? Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference 2016; 2016: 5697–5700
    PubMed
  • 82 von Rosenberg W, Chanwimalueang T, Goverdovsky V. et al. Hearables: feasibility of recording cardiac rhythms from head and in-ear locations. R Soc Open Sci 2017; 4: 171214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Goverdovsky V, von Rosenberg W, Nakamura T. et al. Hearables: Multimodal physiological in-ear sensing. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 6948
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Albrecht UV, Jungnicke T, von Jan U. iSignIT - Communication App and Concept for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 213: 283-286
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Bobian M, Kandinov A, El-Kashlan N. et al. Mobile applications and patient education: Are currently available GERD mobile apps sufficient?. Laryngoscope 2017; 127: 1775-1779
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Jethanamest D, Azadpour M, Zeman AM. et al. A Smartphone Application for Customized Frequency Table Selection in Cochlear Implants. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38: e253-e261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Larrosa F, Dura MJ, Roura J. et al. Rhinoplasty planning with an iPhone app: analysis of otolaryngologists response. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270: 2473-2477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Albrecht UV, von Jan U, Jungnickel T. et al. App-synopsis – standard reporting for medical apps. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013; 192: 1154
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 http://www.plrimedapplab.de
    PubMed
  • 90 Albrecht UV, Pramann O, von Jan U. App-Synopsis: Checkliste zur Selbsteinschätzung der Vertrauenswürdigkeit von Health-Apps. 2014, DOI: 341
    PubMed
  • 91 Baugh RF, Basura GJ, Ishii LE. et al. Clinical practice guideline: Bell's palsy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 149: S1-S27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Butler DP, Grobbelaar AO. Facial palsy: what can the multidisciplinary team do?. J Multidiscip Healthc 2017; 10: 377-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Lindsay RW, Robinson M, Hadlock TA. Comprehensive facial rehabilitation improves function in people with facial paralysis: a 5-year experience at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 391-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Teixeira LJ, Soares BG, Vieira VP. et al. Physical therapy for Bell s palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; DOI: DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006283.pub2. CD006283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 http://bellspalsytraining.com
    PubMed
  • 96 Pourmomeny AA, Zadmehr H, Hossaini M. Measurement of facial movements with Photoshop software during treatment of facial nerve palsy. J Res Med Sci 2011; 16: 1313-1318
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 https://www.apple.com/de/researchkit/
    PubMed