Download PDF
Rofo 2018; 190(11): 1025-1035
DOI: 10.1055/a-0647-2021
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

4D-Flow MRI: Technique and Applications

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Alexandra Sträter
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Technical University of Munich
,
Armin Huber
2   Department of Radiology, Hospital Fürstenfeldbruck
,
Jan Rudolph
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Technical University of Munich
,
Maria Berndt
3   Department of Neurology, University Hospital Technical University of Munich
,
Michael Rasper
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Technical University of Munich
,
Ernst J. Rummeny
3   Department of Neurology, University Hospital Technical University of Munich
,
Jonathan Nadjiri
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Technical University of Munich
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 March 2017

07 May 2018

Publication Date:
13 August 2018 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Blood flow through the cavities of the heart and great vessels is pulsatile and is subject to time and multidirectional variations. To date, the recording of blood flow in multiple directions and phases has been limited. 4D-flow MRI offers advantages for the recording, visualization and analysis of blood flow.

Method The status quo of the method was summarized through analysis with the PubMed database using the keywords “4D-flow MRI, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging, MR flow imaging/visualization, MR flow quantification, 3 D cine (time-resolved) phase-contrast CMR, three-directional velocity-encoding MRI”.

Results/Conclusion This review summarizes the current status of the technical development of 4D-flow MRI, discusses its advantages and disadvantages and describes clinical applications. Finally, the most important principles and parameters are explained to give the reader relevant information about clinical indications, postprocessing methods and limitations of the method.

Key Points: 

  • 4D-Fluss-MRT

  • 3-dimensionale zeitaufgelöste Phasenkontrast-MRT

  • Flussanalyse-MRT (Wall-Shear-Stress/Druckgradienten-Messung/Vortex-Fluss/turbulente kinetische Energie/Flussgeschwindigkeit/Flussrate)

Citation Format

  • Sträter A, Huber A, Rudolph J et al. 4D-Flow MRI: Technique and Applications. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2018; 190: 1025 – 1035

Key words

MR-angiography - angiocardiography - cardiac - vascular - MR-imaging
 

  • References

  • 1 Dyverfeld P. et al. 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement. J Cardiovasc Mag Res 2015; 17: 72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 François CJ, Markl M, Schiebler ML. et al. Four-dimensional, flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow patterns in thoracic aortic dissections. Eur Radiol 2012 221122–30.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Johnson KM, Markl M. Improved SNR in phase contrast velocimetry with five-point balanced flow encoding. Mag Res MEd 2010; 63: 349-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Uribe S, Beerbaum P, Sorensen TS. et al. Four-dimensional (4D) flow of the whole heart and great vessels using real-time respiratory self-gating. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 984-992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bernstein MA, Zhou XJ, Polzin JA. et al. Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Mag Res Med 1998; 39: 300-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Abdul-Rahman HS. et al. Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm. Appl Opt 2007; 46: 6623-6635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ha H. et al. Hemodynamic Measurement Using Four-Dimensional Phase-Contrast MRI: Quantification of Hemodynamic Parameters and Clinical Applications. Korean Journal of Radiology 2016; 17: 445-462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bagan P. et al. Cerebral ischemia during carotid artery cross-clamping: predictive value of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Vasc Surg 2006; 20: 747-752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hope T. et al. Evaluation of intracranial stenoses and aneurysms with accelerated 4D flow. Mag Res Imag 2010; 28: 41-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK. et al. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 1985; 5: 293-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Guzzardi DG. et al. Valve-Related Hemodynamics Mediate Human Bicuspid Aortopathy: Insights From Wall Shear Stress Mapping. J Am Col Cardiol 2015; 66: 892-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Barker AJ. et al. Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imag 2012; 5: 457-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bissel MM. et al. Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Circ Cardiovasc Imag 2013; 6: 499-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 van Ooij P, Potters WV, Guédon A. et al. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm. J Magn Res Imag 2013; 38: 876-884
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Isoda H, Ohkura Y, Kosugi T. et al. In vivo hemodynamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms obtained by magnetic resonance fluid dynamics (MRFD) based on time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. Neuroradiology 2010; 52: 921-928
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dyverfeldt P, Gårdhagen R, Sigfridsson A. et al. On MRI turbulence quantification. Mag Res Imag 2009; 27: 913-922
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Zajac J, Eriksson J, Dyverfeldt P. et al. Turbulent kinetic energy in normal and myopathic left ventricles. J Mag Res Imag 2015; 41: 1021-1029
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wong KK, Kelso RM, Worthley SG. et al. Cardiac flow analysis applied to phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the heart. Ann Biomed Eng 2009; 37: 1495-1515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Elbaz MS. et al. Vortex flow during early and late left ventricular filling in normal subjects: quantitative characterization using retrospectively-gated 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and three-dimensional vortex core analysis. J Cardiovasc Mag Res 2014; DOI: 10.1186/s12968-014-0078-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Manka R, Busch J, Crelier G. et al. Pre- and post-operative assessment of valvular and aortic flow using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 1423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Curiie PJ, Seward JB, Reeder GS. et al. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation 1985; 71: 1162-1169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cohn JN, Quyyumi AA, Hollenberg NK. et al. Surrogate markers for cardiovascular disease: functional markers. Circulation 2004; DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000133442.99186.39.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bley TA. et al. Noninvasive assessment of transstenotic pressure gradients in porcine renal artery stenoses by using vastly undersampled phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 2011; 261: 266-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lum DP, Johnson KM, Paul RK. et al. Transstenotic pressure gradients: measurement in swine--retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires. Radiology 2007; 245: 751-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wentland AL, Wieben O, François CJ. et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity measurements with undersampled 4D flow-sensitive MRI: comparison with 2D and algorithm determination. J Magn Res Ima 2013; 37: 853-859
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bogren HG, Mohiaddin RH, Kilner PJ. et al. Blood flow patterns in the thoracic aorta studied with three-directional MR velocity mapping: the effects of age and coronary artery disease. J Mag Res IM 1997; 7: 784-793
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Harloff A, Strecker C, Frydrychowicz AP. et al. Plaques in the descending aorta: a new risk factor for stroke? Visualization of potential embolization pathways by 4D MRI. J Mag Res Imag 2007; 26: 1651-1655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sträter A, Korte S. et al. Feedforward activation of endothelial ENaC by high sodium. FASEB 2014; 28: 4015-4025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mahadevia R, Barker AJ, Schnell S. et al. Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic three-dimensional outflow patterns, wall shear stress, and expression of aortopathy. Circulation 2014; 129: 673-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK. et al. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 1985; 5: 293-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJ. et al. The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeuic implications. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005; 2: 456-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Monarriz PM, Gomez PA, Paredes I. et al. Basic Principles of Hemodynamics an cerebral Aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2016; 88: 311-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Tanweer O, Wilson TA, Metaxa E. et al. A comparative review of the hemodynamics and pathogenesis of cerebral and abdominal aortic aneurysms: lessons to lear from each other. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2014; 16: 335-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Reiter U, Reiter G, Kovacs G. et al. Evaluation of elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure based on magnetic resonance 4D velocity mapping: comparison of visualization techniques. PLoS One 2013; 8: e82212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Vasanawala SS, Hanneman K, Alley MT. et al. Congenital heart disease assesment with 4D flow MRI. J Mag Res Imag 2015; 42: 870-886
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Goldmann ME, Pearce LA, Hart RG. et al. Pathophysiologic correlates of thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: Reduces flow velocity in the left atrial appendage. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12: 1080-1087
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Handke M, Harloff A, Hetzel A. et al. Left atrial appendage flow velocity as a qualitative surrogate parameter for thromboembolic risk: determinats and relationship to spontaneous echocontrast and thrombus formation- a transoesophageal echocardiographic study in 500 patients with cerebral isc. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1366-1372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Lee DC, Goldberger JJ, Fluckiger J. et al. Analysis of left atrial flow velocity distribution in 4D flow MRI in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2013; 128: A17900
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Saito Y, Sakuma H, Shibata M. et al. Assesment of coronary flow velocity reserve using fast velocity encoded cine MRI for noninvasive detection of restenosis after coronary stent implantation. J Cardiovasc Mag Reson 2001; 3: 209-214
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Nagel E, Thouet T, Klein C. et al. Noninvasive determination of coronary blood flow velocity with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after stent deployment. Circulation 2003; 107: 1738-1702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Harloff A, Markl M, Frydrychowicz A. et al. Diagnostik von Schlaganfallursachen. Der Nervenarzt 2009; 80: 929-940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Rayz VL, Boussel L, Ge L. et al. Flow residence time and regions of intraluminal thrombus deposition in intracranial aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38: 3058-3069
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Isolda H, Olikura Y, Kosugi T. et al. In vivo haemodyamic analysis of intracranial aneurysms obtained by magnetic resonance fluid dynamics (MRFD) based on time-resolved three-dimensional phasecontrast MRI. Neuroradiology 2010; 52: 921-928
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Hope TA, Hope MD, Purcell DD. et al. Evaluation of intracranial stenoses and aneurysms with accelerated 4D flow. Mag Res Imaging 2010; 28: 41-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Markl M, Lee DC, Ng J. et al. Left atrial 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging: stasis and velocity mapping in patients with atrial fibrillation. Invest Radiol 2016; 51: 147-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Roland-Alzate A, Francois CJ, Wieben O. et al. Emerging Applications of Abdominal 4D Flow MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar