CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Sports Med Int Open 2018; 02(04): E117-E122
DOI: 10.1055/a-0637-8719
Physiology & Biochemistry
Eigentümer und Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018

Effects of Backpack Load and Trekking Poles on Energy Expenditure During Field Track Walking

João Paulo Brito
1   Sports Sciences School of Rio Maior, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Rio Maior, Portugal
,
Nuno Garrido
2   University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Sports, Exercise and Health Department, Vila Real, Portugal
,
Félix Romero
1   Sports Sciences School of Rio Maior, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Rio Maior, Portugal
,
Adenilson Targino de Araújo Junior
3   Centro de Investigacao em Desporto Saude e Desenvolvimento Humano, Real, Portugal
,
Victor Machado Reis
4   Research Center for Sports, Health & Human Development, University of Trás-os-Montes & Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received  07 February 2017
revised   07 April 2018

accepted  18 May 2018

Publication Date:
06 September 2018 (online)

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of the use of backpack load and trekking poles on field track walking energy expenditure. Twenty male volunteer pole walkers (age: 22.70±2.89 years; body mass: 77.90±11.19 kg; height: 1.77±0.06 m; percentage of body fat: 14.6±6.0%) walked at a self-selected pace on a pedestrian field track over a period of more than six months. Each subject was examined at random based on four walking conditions: non-poles and non-load, with poles and non-load, non-poles and with load, with poles and with load. Heart rate, oxygen uptake and energy expenditure were continuously recorded by a portable telemetric system. Non-load walking speed was lower during walking with poles when compared with no poles (p≤0.05). Oxygen uptake, energy expenditure and heart rate varied significantly across different conditions. Our results suggest that the use of trekking poles does not influence energy expenditure when walking without an additional load, but it can have an effect during backpack load walking. Moreover, our results indicate that the use of trekking poles may not be helpful to lower the exertion perceived by the subjects when walking with an additional load.

 
  • References

  • 1 Abe D, Yanagawa K, Niihata S. Effects of load carriage, load position, and walking speed on energy cost of walking. Appl Ergon 2004; 35: 329-335
  • 2 Bastien GJ, Willems PA, Schepens B, Heglund NC. Effect of load and speed on the energetic cost of human walking. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005; 9: 76-83
  • 3 Bhambhani Y, Maikala R. Gender differences during treadmill walking with graded loads: Biomechanical and physiological comparisons. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 81: 75-83
  • 4 Bohne M, Abendroth-Smith J. Effects of hiking downhill using trekking poles while carrying external loads. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 77-183
  • 5 Carey TS, Crompton RH. The metabolic costs of bent-hip, bent-knee walking in humans. J Hum Evol 2005; 48: 25-44
  • 6 Church TS, Earnest CP, Morss GM. Field-testing of physiological responses associated with Nordic walking. Res Q Exerc Sport 2002; 73: 296-300
  • 7 Dames KD, Smith JD. Effects of load carriage and footwear on spatiotemporal parameters, kinematics and metabolic cost of walking. Gait & Posture 2015; 42: 122-126
  • 8 DeVoe D. Caloric expenditure during backpacking. J Hum Mov Stud 2001; 40: 259-268
  • 9 Di Prampero PE. The energy cost of human locomotion on land and in water. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7: 55-72
  • 10 Doshi G, Shende M, Bhalerao S, Patel H, Wakpaijan K, Thaker Z, Rao T. Effects of Nordic walking on gait parameters on leveled ground (0°) and inclined slope (30°) in healthy individuals. 2017; 4: 56-61
  • 11 Durnin JVGA. The oxygen consumption, energy expenditure and efficiency of climbing with loads at low altitudes. J Physiol 1955; 128: 294-309
  • 12 Elia M, Livesey G. Energy expenditure and fuel selection in biological systems: The theory and practice of calculations based on indirect calorimetry and tracer methods. World Rev Nutr Diet 1992; 70: 68-131
  • 13 Falola JM, Delpech N, Brisswalter J. Optimization characteristics of walking with and without a load on the trunk of the body. Percept Motor Skill 2000; 91: 261-272
  • 14 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner AG. *Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 392: 175-191
  • 15 Gomeñuka N, Bona R, Rosa R, Peyré-Tartaruga L. The pendular mechanism does not determine the optimal speed of loaded walking on gradients. Hum Mov Sci 2016; 47: 175-185
  • 16 Gomeñuka A, Bona L, Rosa R, Peyré-Tartaruga L. Adaptations to changing speed, load, and gradient in human walking: Cost of transport, optimal speed, and pendulum. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2014; 24: 165-173
  • 17 Gottschall J, Kram R. Energy cost and muscular activity required for propulsion during walking. J Appl Physiol 2003; 94: 1766-1772
  • 18 Hansen L, Henriksen M, Larsen P, Alkjaer T. Nordic walking does not reduce the loading of the knee joint. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2008; 18: 436-441
  • 19 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2018 update. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 1126-1131
  • 20 Hoffman MD, Millet GY, Candau RB, Rouillon JD. Evaluation of a theoretical model to quantify the sources of metabolic cost in walking. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2004; 83: 353-362
  • 21 Howatson G, Hough P, Pattison J, Hill JA, Blagrove R, Glaister M, Thompson KJ. Trekking poles reduce exercised-induced muscle injury during mountain walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 140-145
  • 22 Huang TP, Kuo AD. Mechanics and energetics of load carriage during human walking. J Exp Biol 2014; 217: 605-613
  • 23 Jacobson BH, Kaloupek J, Smith DB. Load carriage force production comparison between standard and anti-shock trekking poles. Sport J 2005 [cited 2017 Feb 06]. Available from http://thesportjournal.org/article/load-carriage-force-production-comparison-between-standardand-anti-shock-trekking-poles/
  • 24 Jacobson B, Wright T. A field test comparison of hiking stick use on heart rate rating of perceived exertion. Percept Motor Skill 2000; 87: 435-438
  • 25 Jacobson BH, Wright T, Dugan B. Load carriage energy expenditure with and without hiking poles during inclined walking. Int J Sports Med 2000; 21: 356-359
  • 26 Knight C, Caldwell G. Muscular and metabolic cost of uphill backpacking: Are hiking poles beneficial?. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 2093-2101
  • 27 Murtagh EM, Boreham CA, Murphy MH. Speed and exercise intensity of recreational walkers. Prev Med 2002; 54: 397-400
  • 28 O’Dwyer NJ, Neilson PD. Metabolic energy expenditure and accuracy in movement. In: Sparrow WA. ed. Energetics of Human Activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2000: 1-42
  • 29 Pellegrini B, Peyre-Tartaruga L, Zoppirolli C, Bortolan L, Bacchi E, Figard-Fabre H, Schena F. Exploring muscle activation during Nordic walking: A comparison between conventional and uphill walking. Plos One 2015; 10: 1-13
  • 30 Pellegrini B, Peyre-Tartaruga L, Zoppirolli C, Bortolan L, Savoldelli A, Minetti A, Schena F. Mechanical energy patterns in Nordic walking: Comparisons with conventional walking. Gait Posture 2017; 51: 234-238
  • 31 Porcari J, Hendrickson T, Walter P, Terry L, Walsko G. The physiological responses to walking with and without power poles TM on treadmill exercise. Res Q Exerc Sport 1997; 6: 161-166
  • 32 Saunders MJ, Hipp GR, Wenos DL, Deaton ML. Trekking poles increase physiological responses to hiking without increased perceived exertion. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 1468-1474
  • 33 Schiffer T, Knicker A, Montanarella M, Struder H. Mechanical and physiological effects of varying pole weights during Nordic walking compared to walking. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 1121-1126
  • 34 Sklar J, DeVoe D, Gotshall R. Metabolic effects of using bilateral trekking poles whilst hiking. J Hum Mov Stud 2003; 44: 73-185
  • 35 Willson J, Torry MR, Decker MJ, Kernozek T. Effects of walking poles on lower extremity gait mechanics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 142-147