Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) Characterized with Velocity Ratios using Vector Velocity Ultrasound

Abstract

Purpose Atherosclerotic arteries are challenging to evaluate quantitatively using spectral Doppler ultrasound because of the turbulent flow conditions that occur in relation to the atherosclerotic stenoses. Vector velocity ultrasound is angle independent and provides flow information, which could potentially improve the diagnosis of arterial stenoses. The purpose of the study is to distinguish significant stenoses in the superficial femoral artery (> 50% diameter reduction) from non-significant stenoses based on velocity ratios derived from the commercially available vector velocity ultrasound technique Vector Flow Imaging (VFI).

Materials and Methods Velocity ratios (intrastenotic blood flow velocity divided by pre- or poststenotic velocity) from a total of 16 atherosclerotic stenoses and plaques in the superficial femoral artery of 11 patients were obtained using VFI. The stenosis degree, expressed as percentage diameter reduction of the artery, was determined from digital subtraction angiography and compared to the velocity ratios.

Results A velocity ratio of 2.5 was found to distinguish clinically relevant stenoses with>50% diameter reduction from clinically non-relevant stenoses with<50% diameter reduction and the difference was statistically significant.

Conclusion The study indicates that VFI is a potential future tool for the evaluation of arterial stenoses.

Key words

angiography - velocity ratio - atherosclerosis - peripheral arterial disease - vector velocity ultrasound

• References

• 1 Barquera S, Pedroza-Tobías A, Medina C. et al. Global overview of the epidemiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Arch Med Res 2015; 46: 328-338
• 2 Egglin TKP, O’Moore PV, Feinstein AR. et al. Complications of peripheral arteriography: A new system to identify patients at increased risk. J Vasc Surg 1995; 22: 787-794
• 3 Ranke C, Creutzig A, Alexander K. Duplex scanning of the peripheral arteries: Correlation of the peak velocity ratio with angiographic diameter reduction. Ultrasound Med Biol 1992; 18: 433-440
• 4 Khan SZ, Khan MA, Bradley B. et al. Utility of duplex ultrasound in detecting and grading de novo femoropopliteal lesions. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 1067-1073
• 5 Schlager O, Francesconi M, Haumer M. et al. Duplex sonography versus angiography for assessment of femoropopliteal arterial disease in a “Real-World” setting. J Endovasc Ther 2007; 14: 452-459
• 6 Baxter GM, Polak JF. Lower limb colour flow imaging: A comparison with ankle: Brachial measurements and angiography. Clin Radiol 1993; 47: 91-95
• 7 Flanigan DP, Ballard JL, Robinson D. et al. Duplex ultrasound of the superficial femoral artery is a better screening tool than ankle-brachial index to identify at risk patients with lower extremity atherosclerosis. J Vasc Surg 2008; 47: 789-793
• 8 Gill RW. Measurement of blood flow by ultrasound: Accuracy and sources of error. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985; 11: 625-641
• 9 Lui EYL, Steinman AH, Cobbold RSC. et al. Human factors as a source of error in peak Doppler velocity measurement. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42: 972-979
• 10 Jensen JA, Munk P. A new method for estimation of velocity vectors. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1998; 45: 837-851
• 11 Udesen J, Jensen JA. Investigation of transverse oscillation method. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2006; 53: 959-971
• 12 Udesen J, Nielsen MB, Nielsen KR. et al. Examples of In Vivo Blood Vector Velocity Estimation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007; 33: 541-548
• 13 Hansen KL, Pedersen MM, Møller-Sørensen H. et al. Intraoperative cardiac ultrasound examination using vector flow imaging. ultrason imaging 2013; 35: 318-332
• 14 Hansen PM, Pedersen MM, Hansen KL. et al. New technology - demonstration of a vector velocity technique. Ultraschall Med 2011; 32: 213-215
• 15 Hansen PM, Olesen JB, Pihl MJ. et al. Volume flow in arteriovenous fistulas using vector velocity ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014; 40: 2707-2714
• 16 Pedersen MM, Pihl MJ, Haugaard P. et al. Comparison of real-time in vivo spectral and vector velocity estimation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012; 38: 145-151
• 17 Hansen KL, Møller-Sørensen H, Pedersen MM. et al. First report on intraoperative vector flow imaging of the heart among patients with healthy and diseased aortic valves. Ultrasonics 2015; 56: 243-250
• 18 Brandt AH, Jensen J, Hansen KL. et al. Surveillance for hemodialysis access stenosis: Usefulness of ultrasound vector volume flow. J Vasc Access. 2016; 17: 483-488
• 19 Brandt AH, Hansen KL, Nielsen MB. et al. Velocity estimation of the main portal vein with Transverse Oscillation. IEEE Int Ultrason Symp 2015; 1-4
• 20 Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA. et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 2007; 45: 5-67
• 21 Jensen JA, Brandt AH, Nielsen MB. Convex array vector velocity imaging using transverse oscillation and its optimization. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2015; 62: 2043-2053
• 22 Painter PR. The velocity of the arterial pulse wave: A viscous-fluid shock wave in an elastic tube. Theor Biol Med Model 2008; 5: 15
• 23 Koivistoinen T, Kööbi T, Jula A. et al. Pulse wave velocity reference values in healthy adults aged 26–75 years. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2007; 27: 191-196
• 24 Jensen J, Olesen JB, Stuart MB. et al. Vector velocity volume flow estimation: Sources of error and corrections applied for arteriovenous fistulas. Ultrasonics 2016; 70: 136-146
• 25 Hansen KL, Møller-Sørensen H, Kjaergaard J. et al. Intra-operative vector flow imaging using ultrasound of the ascending aorta among 40 patients with normal, stenotic and replaced aortic valves. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016; 42: 2414-2422
• 26 Sigovan M, Dyverfeldt P, Wrenn J. et al. Extended 3D approach for quantification of abnormal ascending aortic flow. Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 33: 695-700
• 27 Weisenberg D, Sahar Y, Sahar G. et al. Atherosclerosis of the aorta is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis: An intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 130: 29-32