Download PDF
Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2011; 08(01): 33-36
DOI: 10.1016/S0973-0508(11)80021-3
Original article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Traumatic paraplegia: Outcome study at an apex trauma centre

Siddhartha S Sahoo
,
Deepak Gupta
,
AK Mahapatra
Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 April 2017 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Aim of this study was to assess neurological improvement after surgical intervention in cases of traumatic paraplegia classified by Frankel scoring. A retrospective study of operated cases of traumatic paraplegia over a period of fifteen months (Jan 2009 to March 2010) was carried out at Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi. The analysis included a total of 66 cases of paraplegia (Frankel A or B). Data collected from patient records included age, sex, time from injury to hospitalization, initial neurological status as per Frankel Score, MRI findings, surgery performed, postoperative course and neurological status at the time of discharge and latest follow up. Patients lost to follow up were not studied for outcome analysis. SPSS 16 was used for the statistical analysis.

The mechanism of injury was fall from height in 56.1 % (n=37) cases. & Road Traffic accident in 30.3% (n=20) cases. Median interval from time of injury to admission was 2 days (range, 0–75days). The most common site of injury was D11 to L1 in 57.57% (n=38) cases. Decompression and long segment pedicular fixation with bony fusion was the most common procedure performed. Median follow up period was six months (range, 1–12months). Sixty two percent (n=41) were lost to follow up. Forty four percent (n=11/25) improved on continued follow up till August 2010. and 16% (n=4/25) improved to useful motor score Frankel D or E.

Traumatic paraplegia patients need a holistic approach. Instrumentation of spine facilitates early mobilization and adds to the ease of rehabilitation. The decision of operative management should be case based.

Keywords

traumatic paraplegia - decompression - posterior fixation
 

  • References

  • 1 Vale FL, Burns J, Jackson AB, Hadley MN. Combined medical and surgical treatment after acute spinal cord injury: results of a prospective pilot study to assess the merits of aggressive medical resuscitation and blood pressure management. J Neurosurg. 1997; 87: 239-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Boerger TO, Limb D, Dickson RA. Does ‘canal clearance’ affect neurological outcome after thoracolumbar burst fractures?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82: 629-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, Poonian D. Sygen Study Group. Recruitment and early treatment in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury. Spine 2001; 26 (Suppl. 24) 58-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar. Efficacy of surgical decompression in the setting of complete thoracic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2005; 28: 415-420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bohlman HH, Freehafer A. Late anterior decompression of spinal cord injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975; 57: 10-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Reinhold M, Knop C, Beisse R. et al Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spinal column: Part III: Follow-up data. Unfallchirurg 2009; 112: 294-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Prabhakar Mukund M., Singh Bhagwat, Patel Lilam. Thoracolumbar burst fracture with complete paraplegia: rationale for second-stage anterior decompression and fusion regarding functional outcome. J Orthop Traumatol 2009; 10: 83-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Lasda NA. The unstable burst fracture. Spine 1982; 07: 365-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar