Comparison of Transverse Intraosseous Loop Technique and Pull Out Suture for Reinsertion of the Flexor Digitorum Profundus tendon. A Retrospective Study

Abstract

We compared the results of two methods for reinsertion of flexor digitorum profundus tendons retrospectively. In 35 fingers of 29 patients pull-out suture and in 13 fingers of 11 patients transverse intraosseous loop technique was performed with a mean follow-up of 8 and 6 months, respectively. Eleven and nine fingers achieved “excellent” or “good” function according to Strickland and Glogovac at 8 weeks; 20 and ten at the last control in the pull-out and transverse intraosseous loop groups, respectively. The difference at 8 weeks was statistically significant in favour of the transverse intraosseous loop group. Ten patients underwent 12 complications in the pull-out group (four superficial infections; one rerupture, one PIP and one DIP joint contracture, one adhesion, two granulomas, one nail deformity and one carpal tunnel syndrome) and four of them were reoperated (one carpal tunnel release, one teno-arthrolysis and two resections of granuloma). There was no complication and no reoperation in the transverse intraosseous loop group, the difference being statistically significant for the former. In our study the transverse intraosseous loop technique seemed to be a safe alternative with possibly better functional results compared to the pull-out suture.

Keywords

Flexor tendon - Reinsertion - Pull-out suture - Transverse intraosseous loop technique

• References

• 1 Bunnell S. Primery repair of the severed tendons. The use of stainless steel wire. Am J Surg 1940; 47: 502-516
• 2 Wilson S, Sammut D. Flexor tendon graft attachment: a review of methods and a newly modified tendon graft attachment. J Hand Surg 2003; 28B: 116-120
• 3 Tripathi AK, Mee SN, Martin DL, Katsarma E. The “transverse intraosseous loop technique” (TILT) to re-insert flexor tendons in zone 1. J Hand Surg 2009; 34E: 85-89
• 4 Azzopardi EA, Iyer S, Re: Tripathi AK, Mee SN, Martin DL, Katsarma E. The ‘transverse intraosseous loop technique’ (TILT) to re-insert flexor tendons in zone 1. J Hand Surg Eur 2009; 34: 85-89 J Hand Surg 34E:701
• 5 Yotsumoto T, Mori R, Uchio Y. Optimum locations of the locking loop and knot in tendon sutures based on the locking Kessler method. J Orthop Sci 2005; 10: 515-520
• 6 Strickland JW, Glogovac SV. Digital function following flexor tendon repair in zone II: a comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques. J Hand Surg 1980; 5A: 537-543
• 7 Sood MK, Elliot D. A new technique of attachment of flexor tendons to the distal phalanx without a button tie-over. J Hand Surg 1996; 21B: 629-632
• 8 Matsuzaki H, Zaegel MA, Gelberman RH, Silva MJ. Effect of suture material and bone quality on the mechanical properties of zone I flexor tendon-bone reattachment with bone anchors. J Hand Surg 2008; 33A: 709-717
• 9 Moiemen NS, Elliot D. Primary flexor tendon repair in zone 1. J Hand Surg 2000; 25B: 78-84
• 10 Leddy JP, Packer JW. Avulsion of the profundus tendon insertion in athletes. J Hand Surg 1977; 2A: 66-69
• 11 Gerbino PG, Saldana MJ, Westerbeck P, Schacherer TG. Complications experienced in the rehabilitation of zone I flexor tendon injuries with dynamic traction splinting. J Hand Surg 1991; 16A: 680-686
• 12 Kang N, Marsh D, Dewar D. The morbidity of the button-over-nail technique for zone 1 flexor tendon repairs. Should we still be using this technique?. J Hand Surg 2008; 33E: 566-570