Int J Angiol 1995; 4(4): 218-223
DOI: 10.1007/BF02042924
Original Articles

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Involvement of Lipoprotein(a) in calcification of coronary arteries and thoracic aorta as detected by X-ray computed tomography

Eiji Tamiya, Ryoji Kishi, Kazuro Sugishita, Nobuhiko Ito, Hiroshi Ikenouchi, Yoshiyuki Hada
  • Department of Cardiology, JR Tokyo General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Presented at the 35th Annual Congress of the International College of Angiology in Copenhagen, Denmark, July 1993
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 April 2011 (online)

Abstract

The authors compared the severity of coronary calcification and thoracic aortic calcification as detected by x-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT) with Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and investigated whether Lp(a) is more important than total cholesterol (TC) or HDL-cholesterol (HDLC) as a risk factor for arteriosclerosis. Subjects were 64 patients (47 males, mean age 57.1 ± 8.4 years) comprising 43 cases of ischemic heart disease, 9 cases of chest pain syndrome, 7 of valvular heart disease, and 5 of dilated cardiomyopathy. Fasted blood samples were collected early in the morning and values before medication were used. Lp(a) was measured by ELISA. Evaluation of coronary calcification by X-ray CT was performed in accordance with the procedure described in the authors' previous reports. Coronary calcification was assessed in all slices (slice thickness: 1 cm; scoring system: no coronary calcification, 0 points; coronary calcification less than 1 cm in length, 1 point; 1–2 cm, 2 points; over 2 cm, 3 points). The total score was used as coronary calcification score. For the aortic calcification score, the total number of aorta (slice thickness: 1 cm) with calcification from the superior margin of the aortic arch to the inferior cardiac margin was used. Mean scores of coronary and aortic calcification were 6.1 ± 7.9 and 4.5 ± 5.2 points, and Lp(a), TC, and HDLC, 23.7 ± 23.3, 213 ± 37, and 49.9 ± 15.1 mg/dl, respectively. No correlation was seen between the scores of both coronary calcification and aortic calcification and any of the three lipid parameters, but for cases without coronary calcification, Lp(a) (10.6 ± 8.5 mg/dl) was significantly lower (p < 0.1) than that for cases with coronary calcification (1 vessel, 29.4 ± 24.4; 2 vessels, 26.5 ± 16.7; 3 vessels, 32.6 ± 31.0 mg/dl).

No significant difference was observed, however, for TC and HDLC between patients with and without coronary calcification/aortic calcification. It is suggested that Lp(a) may be a risk factor for coronary calcification. There is no correlation, however, between Lp(a) and the severity of coronary calcification. Aortic calcification is not related to the serum Lp(a) level.