PDF herunterladen
Lin, Samuel J. et al.: 2024 Neck Rejuvenation DOI: 10.1055/b-0044-201794

14 Revisional and Secondary Neck Lifts

Weitere Informationen

Buch

Herausgeber: Lin, Samuel J.; Slavin, Sumner A.; Tandon, Vickram J.

Autoren: Angelini, Matteo A.; Cunha Araujo, Marcelo; Barrios, Esther; Bellamy, Justin; Boustany, Ashley N.; Chia, Christopher T.; Citarella, Enzo R.; Condé-Green, Alexandra; Couto, Rafael A.; Dayan, Erez; Dover, Jeffrey S.; Ebersole, Trina G.; Foppiani, Jose A.; Gould, Daniel J.; Grover, Ritwik; Grow, Jacob N.; Janne Hasbun, Samir; Hogan, Sara R.; Hurwitz, Dennis J.; Kaminer, Michael S.; Kaminer, Michael S.; Kochuba, Andrew L.; Maia, Munique; Matarasso, Alan; Nassar, Amer H.; Nicholas, Mathew N.; Piña, Jeremie O.; Pelle-Ceravolo, Mario; Rodriguez-Unda, Nelson A.; Rohrich, Rod J.; Sinder, Ramil; Sterodimas, Aris; Talei, Benjamin; Ziai, Hedyeh; Zins, James E.

Titel: Neck Rejuvenation

Untertitel: Surgical and Nonsurgical Techniques

Print ISBN: 9781626239630; Online ISBN: 9781684202850; Buch-DOI: 10.1055/b000000386

1. Edition © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., New York

Fachgebiete: Plastische, Rekonstruktive & Kosmetische Chirurgie

Thieme Clinical Collections (English Language)



 
Ashley N. Boustany, Vickram J. Tandon, and Sumner A. Slavin

Abstract

The neck contour and laxity are common concerns in patients seeking facial rejuvenation. Patients seek a secondary neck lift due to the unrelenting natural aging process, unsatisfactory results, early recurrence, or iatrogenic deformities. It is important to identify the patient’s goals and determine the etiology. Technical challenges arise due to altered anatomy in the previously operated field and scarred tissue planes. One must strategically plan incision placement for optimal scar camouflage and prevention of complications. Acquired deformities should be approached methodically. Longevity of results may be optimized with treatment of the deeper planes and maintenance regimen adjuncts.

Schlüsselwörter

revision neck lift - secondary neck lift - neck lift complications - aging neck - rhytidectomy longevity - reoperative neck lift
 
  • 1 Narasimhan K, Ramanadham S, O’Reilly E, Rohrich RJ. Secondary neck lift and the importance of midline platysmaplasty: review of 101 cases.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (4) 667e-675e PubMed (PMID: 27018694)
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Skouras GA, Skouras AG, Skoura EA. Revision and secondary facelift: problems frequently encountered.. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (8) e2947 PubMed (PMID: 32983758)
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Guyuron B, Bokhari F, Thomas T. Secondary rhytidectomy.. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100 (5) 1281-1284 PubMed (PMID: 9326793)
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Sundine MJ, Kretsis V, Connell BF. Longevity of SMAS facial rejuvenation and support.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (1) 229-237 PubMed (PMID: 20224461)
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Funk E, Adamson PA. A comparison of primary and secondary rhytidectomy results.. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011; 35 (1) 96-99 PubMed (PMID: 20821008)
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Lihong R, Daping Y, Zhibo X, Ying L, Zhen S. Longevity of SMAS facial rejuvenation and support.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (2) 989-990 PubMed (PMID: 21285809)
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Giampapa V, Bitzos I, Ramirez O, Granick M. Long-term results of suture suspension platysmaplasty for neck rejuvenation: a 13-year follow-up evaluation.. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005; 29 (5) 332-340 PubMed (PMID: 16151660)
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Jones BM, Lo SJ. How long does a face lift last? Objective and subjective measurements over a 5-year period.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (6) 1317-1327 PubMed (PMID: 23190814)
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Stuzin JM. Discussion: how long does a face lift last? Objective and subjective measurements over a 5-year period.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (6) 1328-1329 PubMed (PMID: 23190815)
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Friel MT, Shaw RE, Trovato MJ, Owsley JQ. The measure of face-lift patient satisfaction: the Owsley Facelift Satisfaction Survey with a long-term follow-up study.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (1) 245-257 PubMed (PMID: 20224460)
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Dibbs RP, Chamata E, Ferry AM, Friedman JD. Revision facelift and neck lift.. Semin Plast Surg 2021; 35 (2) 88-97 PubMed (PMID: 34121944)
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Liu TS, Owsley JQ. Long-term results of face lift surgery: patient photographs compared with patient satisfaction ratings.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (1) 253-262 PubMed (PMID: 22186515)
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Rohrich RJ, Narasimhan K. Long-term results in face lifting: observational results and evolution of technique.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (1) 97-108 PubMed (PMID: 27348643)
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Pelle-Ceravolo M, Angelini M, Silvi E. Complete platysma transection in neck rejuvenation: a critical appraisal.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (4) 781-791 PubMed (PMID: 27307341)
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Lambros V, Stuzin JM. Discussion. Longevity of SMAS facial rejuvenation and support.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (1) 238-239 PubMed (PMID: 20595870)
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Antell DE, Orseck MJ. A comparison of face lift techniques in eight consecutive sets of identical twins.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (6) 1667-1673 PubMed (PMID: 18040204)
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Kamer FM, Frankel AS. SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: an objective comparison.. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (3) 878-881 PubMed (PMID: 9727459)
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Becker FF, Bassichis BA. Deep-plane face-lift vs superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift: a comparative study.. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004; 6 (1) 8-13 PubMed (PMID: 14732637)
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Jacono AA, Parikh SS, Kennedy WA. Anatomical comparison of platysmal tightening using superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication vs deep-plane rhytidectomy techniques.. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13 (6) 395-397 PubMed (PMID: 22106184)
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Gassman AA, Pezeshk R, Scheuer III JF, Sieber DA, Campbell CF, Rohrich RJ. Anatomical and clinical implications of the deep and superficial fat compartments of the neck.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (3) 405e-414e PubMed (PMID: 28841605)
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Guyuron B, Sadek EY, Ahmadian R. A 26-year experience with vest-over-pants technique platysmarrhaphy.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (3) 1027-1034 PubMed (PMID: 20463626)
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Alpert BS, Baker DC, Hamra ST, Owsley JQ, Ramirez O. Identical twin face lifts with differing techniques: a 10-year follow-up.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (3) 1025-1033 PubMed (PMID: 19319071)
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Rasko YM, Beale E, Rohrich RJ. Secondary rhytidectomy: comprehensive review and current concepts.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (6) 1370-1378 PubMed (PMID: 23190821)
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Gordon NA, Paskhover B, Tower JI, O’Daniel TG. Neck deformities in plastic surgery.. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2019; 27 (4) 529-555 PubMed (PMID: 31587772)
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Marten T, Elyassnia D. Neck lift: defining anatomic problems and choosing appropriate treatment strategies.. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (4) 455-484 PubMed (PMID: 30268238)
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Beale EW, Rasko Y, Rohrich RJ. A 20-year experience with secondary rhytidectomy: a review of technique, longevity, and outcomes.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (3) 625-634 PubMed (PMID: 23142942)
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Haiavy J. Reoperative face and neck lifts.. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2011; 23 (1) 109-118, vi–vii PubMed (PMID: 21272769)
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Trévidic P, Criollo-Lamilla G. Platysma bands: is a change needed in the surgical paradigm?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (1) 41-47 PubMed (PMID: 27627054)
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Feldman JJ. Discussion: platysma bands: is a change needed in the surgical paradigm?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (1) 48-49 PubMed (PMID: 28027225)
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Rohrich RJ, Taylor NS, Ahmad J, Lu A, Pessa JE. Great auricular nerve injury, the “subauricular band” phenomenon, and the periauricular adipose compartments.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (2) 835-843 PubMed (PMID: 21285786)
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Ramirez OM, Heller L. The anchor tragal flap: a method of preserving the natural pretragal depression during rhytidectomy.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (4) 1115-1121 PubMed (PMID: 16163104)
    Google Scholar