Download PDF
Brauer, Jeremy A.: 2024 Men's Aesthetics: A Practical Guide to Minimally Invasive Treatment DOI: 10.1055/b-0043-198233

6 Finding the Right Balance: Chemical Peels

More Information

Book

Editor: Brauer, Jeremy A.

Authors: Aguilera, Shino Bay; Alam, Murad; Alexis, Andrew F.; Belaidi, Marisa; Bertucci, Vince; Brodsky, Merrick A.; Chang, Yunyoung C.; Chesnut, Cameron; Cotofana, Sebastian; Dutton, Jonathan J.; Erlendsson, Andrés M.; Friedmann, Daniel P.; Green, Jeremy B.; Hanna, Edith A.; Henry, Michelle; Hibler, Brian P.; Hsu, Derek; Keaney, Terrence C.; Lipp, Michael B.; MacGregor, Jennifer L.; Montes, José R.; Munavalli, Gilly; Pineiro, Mildred Lopez; Robinson, Deanne Mraz; Rossi, Anthony M.; MD, Nicole E. Rogers; Reserva, Jeave; Saedi, Nazanin; Sandre, Matthew K.; Soon, Seaver; Soro, Luis; Tung, Rebecca; Wang, Jordan V.; Xing, Yiping

Title: Men's Aesthetics: A Practical Guide to Minimally Invasive Treatment

Print ISBN: 9783132428379; Online ISBN: 9783132437197; Book DOI: 10.1055/b000000260

1. Edition © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Stuttgart

Subjects: Plastic, Reconstructive and Cosmetic Surgery;Minimalinvasive Surgery, Laser Surgery, Laparoscopy

Thieme Clinical Collections (English Language)



 
Jeave Reserva, Rebecca Tung, and Seaver Soon

Summary

Chemical peels are a mainstay of aesthetic medicine and an increasingly popular cosmetic procedure performed in men. The approach to chemical peels in men includes consideration of intrinsic and extrinsic skin variables that affect various aspects of the peeling process. Owing to the increased sebaceous quality of their skin and thicker dermis, male patients, in general, may require a greater number of treatments, larger volumes of peeling agent, more aggressive degreasing and peel application, and/or higher concentration of peeling agent to achieve optimal results. Patient selection is of utmost importance as poor photoprotective behavior and nonadherence to pre- and postpeel regimens could jeopardize clinical outcomes. The aesthetic clinician with good understanding of men’s cosmetic concerns and a solid foundation on basic and advanced peeling techniques can help the contemporary male patient achieve his desired aesthetics. Chemical peels are safe, cost-effective treatments that provide reliable outcomes and should be an integral part of the aesthetic practitioner’s cosmetic repertoire.

Key words

chemical peel - chemexfoliation - chemabrasion - male - aesthetics - trichloroacetic acid - phenol-croton oil - salicylic acid - glycolic acid
 
  • 1 Weissler JM, Carney MJ, Carreras Tartak JA, Bensimon RH, Percec I. The evolution of chemical peeling and modern-day applications.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (5) 920-929 PubMed (PMID: 29068926)
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Brody HJ, Monheit GD, Resnik SS, Alt TH. A history of chemical peeling.. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26 (5) 405-409 PubMed (PMID: 10816224)
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bangash HK, Eisen DB, Armstrong AW et al. Who are the pioneers? A critical analysis of innovation and expertise in cutaneous noninvasive and minimally invasive cosmetic and surgical procedures.. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (3) 335-351 PubMed (PMID: 26918969)
    Google Scholar
  • 4 American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2017 Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. Available at: https://www.surgery.org/media/statistics. Updated 2018. Accessed Dec 15, 2018
  • 5 American Socitey for Dermatologic Surgery. ASDS Survey on Dermatologic Procedures: Report of 2017 Procedures. Available at: https://www.asds.net/medical-professionals/practice-resources/asds-survey-on-dermatologic-procedures. Updated 2018. Accessed Dec 15, 2018
  • 6 International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. ISAPS International Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures Performed in 2017. Available at: https://www.isaps.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ISAPS_2017_International_Study_Cosmetic_Procedures.pdf. Updated 2018. Accessed December 15, 2018
  • 8 Jagdeo J, Keaney T, Narurkar V, Kolodziejczyk J, Gallagher CJ. Facial treatment preferences among aesthetically oriented men.. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (10) 1155-1163 PubMed (PMID: 27661428)
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Frucht CS, Ortiz AE. Nonsurgical cosmetic procedures for men: trends and technique considerations.. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2016; 9 (12) 33-43 PubMed (PMID: 28210397)
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Dewandre L, Tenenbaum A. The chemistry of peels: a hypothesis of action mechanisms and a proposal of a new classification of chemical peelings. In: Tung RC, Rubin MG, eds. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Chemical Peels. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011:1–16
  • 12 Yonei N, Kanazawa N, Ohtani T, Furukawa F, Yamamoto Y. Induction of PDGF-B in TCA-treated epidermal keratinocytes.. Arch Dermatol Res 2007; 299 (9) 433-440 PubMed (PMID: 17724602)
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Kimura A, Kanazawa N, Li HJ, Yonei N, Yamamoto Y, Furukawa F. Influence of chemical peeling on the skin stress response system.. Exp Dermatol 2012; 21 (Suppl. Suppl 1) 8-10 PubMed (PMID: 22626464)
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Kligman AM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. Long-term histologic follow-up of phenol face peels.. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 75 (5) 652-659 PubMed (PMID: 3983273)
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Wambier CG, Lee KC, Soon SL et al. Advanced chemical peels: phenol-croton oil peel.. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 81 (2) 327-336 PubMed (PMID: 30550827)
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Moy LS, Kotler R, Lesser T. The histologic evaluation of pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing versus phenol chemical peels in vivo.. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25 (8) 597-600 PubMed (PMID: 10491040)
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Obagi S. Injectables and resurfacing techniques: chemical peels. In: Rubin JP, ed. Plastic Surgery. Vol. 2. 4th ed. London: Elsevier; 2018:86–96
  • 19 Khunger N. Choosing the right peeling agent. In: Khunger N, ed. Chemical peels. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2014:40
  • 20 Giacomoni PU, Mammone T, Teri M. Gender-linked differences in human skin.. J Dermatol Sci 2009; 55 (3) 144-149 PubMed (PMID: 19574028)
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Rahrovan S, Fanian F, Mehryan P, Humbert P, Firooz A. Male versus female skin: what dermatologists and cosmeticians should know.. Int J Womens Dermatol 2018; 4 (3) 122-130 PubMed (PMID: 30175213)
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Fanous N, Zari S. Universal trichloroacetic acid peel technique for light and dark skin.. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2017; 19 (3) 212-219 PubMed (PMID: 28097306)
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Mizukoshi K, Akamatsu H. The investigation of the skin characteristics of males focusing on gender differences, skin perception, and skin care habits.. Skin Res Technol 2013; 19 (2) 91-99 PubMed (PMID: 23279047)
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Paes EC, Teepen HJ, Koop WA, Kon M. Perioral wrinkles: histologic differences between men and women.. Aesthet Surg J 2009; 29 (6) 467-472 PubMed (PMID: 19944990)
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Sandby-Møller J, Poulsen T, Wulf HC. Epidermal thickness at different body sites: relationship to age, gender, pigmentation, blood content, skin type and smoking habits.. Acta Derm Venereol 2003; 83 (6) 410-413 PubMed (PMID: 14690333)
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Markova MS, Zeskand J, McEntee B, Rothstein J, Jimenez SA, Siracusa LD. A role for the androgen receptor in collagen content of the skin.. J Invest Dermatol 2004; 123 (6) 1052-1056 PubMed (PMID: 15610513)
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Ezure T, Yagi E, Kunizawa N, Hirao T, Amano S. Comparison of sagging at the cheek and lower eyelid between male and female faces.. Skin Res Technol 2011; 17 (4) 510-515 PubMed (PMID: 21466588)
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Hornstra JM, Hoekstra T, Serné EH et al. Homocysteine levels are inversely associated with capillary density in men, not in premenopausal women.. Eur J Clin Invest 2014; 44 (3) 333-340 PubMed (PMID: 24422875)
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Fei W, Xu S, Ma J et al. Fundamental supply of skin blood flow in the Chinese Han population: measurements by a full-field laser perfusion imager.. Skin Res Technol 2018; 24 (4) 656-662 PubMed (PMID: 29740880)
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Stücker M, Steinberg J, Memmel U, Avermaete A, Hoffmann K, Altmeyer P. Differences in the two-dimensionally measured laser Doppler flow at different skin localisations.. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2001; 14 (1) 44-51 PubMed (PMID: 11174090)
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Nikalji N, Godse K, Sakhiya J, Patil S, Nadkarni N. Complications of medium depth and deep chemical peels.. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2012; 5 (4) 254-260 PubMed (PMID: 23378707)
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Staikou C, Kokotis P, Kyrozis A et al. Differences in pain perception between men and women of reproductive age: a laser-evoked potentials study.. Pain Med 2017; 18 (2) 316-321 PubMed (PMID: 28204781)
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Bulls HW, Freeman EL, Anderson AJ, Robbins MT, Ness TJ, Goodin BR. Sex differences in experimental measures of pain sensitivity and endogenous pain inhibition.. J Pain Res 2015; 8: 311-320 PubMed (PMID: 26170713)
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Gilliver SC, Ruckshanthi JP, Hardman MJ, Zeef LA, Ashcroft GS. 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) retards wound closure by inhibiting re-epithelialization.. J Pathol 2009; 217 (1) 73-82 PubMed (PMID: 18855875)
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Gilliver SC, Ashworth JJ, Ashcroft GS. The hormonal regulation of cutaneous wound healing.. Clin Dermatol 2007; 25 (1) 56-62 PubMed (PMID: 17276202)
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Bordignon V, Burastero SE. Age, gender and reactivity to allergens independently influence skin reactivity to histamine.. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2006; 16 (2) 129-135 PubMed (PMID: 16689187)
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Costa IMC, Damasceno PS, Costa MC, Gomes KGP. Review in peeling complications.. J Cosmet Dermatol 2017; 16 (3) 319-326 PubMed (PMID: 28349655)
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Keaney TC. Aging in the male face: intrinsic and extrinsic factors.. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (7) 797-803 PubMed (PMID: 27196541)
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Kass LG, Kass KS. The lost art of chemical peeling: my fifteen year experience with croton oil peel.. Adv Ophthalmol Optom 2017; 2 (1) 391-407 (PMID: NOT_FOUND)
    Google Scholar
  • 41 . Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.. Lancet 2017; 389 (10082) 1885-1906 PubMed (PMID: 28390697)
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Peters SAE, Muntner P, Woodward M. Sex differences in the prevalence of, and trends in, cardiovascular risk factors, treatment, and control in the united states, 2001 to 2016.. Circulation 2019; 139 (8) 1025-1035 PubMed (PMID: 30779652)
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Gill JF, Yu SS, Neuhaus IM. Tobacco smoking and dermatologic surgery.. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 68 (1) 167-172 PubMed (PMID: 23103201)
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Vanaman M, Fabi SG, Carruthers J. Complications in the cosmetic dermatology patient: a review and our experience (part 2).. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (1) 12-20 PubMed (PMID: 26716710)
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2018 Employed Persons by Detailed Occupation, Sex, Race, and Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity. United States Department of Labor. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat10.htm. Accessed February 23, 2019
  • 47 Bertolin M, Cercatto MC, Requena C et al. Awareness, attitude, and adherence to preventive measures in patients at high risk of melanoma. A cross-sectional study on 185 patients.. J Cancer Educ 2015; 30 (3) 552-566 PubMed (PMID: 25510366)
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Damian DL, Patterson CR, Stapelberg M, Park J, Barnetson RS, Halliday GM. UV radiation-induced immunosuppression is greater in men and prevented by topical nicotinamide.. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128 (2) 447-454 PubMed (PMID: 17882270)
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Ide T, Tsutsui H, Ohashi N et al. Greater oxidative stress in healthy young men compared with premenopausal women.. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002; 22 (3) 438-442 PubMed (PMID: 11884287)
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Falk M, Anderson CD. Influence of age, gender, educational level and self-estimation of skin type on sun exposure habits and readiness to increase sun protection.. Cancer Epidemiol 2013; 37 (2) 127-132 PubMed (PMID: 23295002)
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Hantash BM, Stewart DB, Cooper ZA, Rehmus WE, Koch RJ, Swetter SM. Facial resurfacing for nonmelanoma skin cancer prophylaxis.. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142 (8) 976-982 PubMed (PMID: 16924046)
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Crudele J, Kim E, Murray K, Regan J. The importance of understanding consumer preferences for dermatologist recommended skin cleansing and care products.. J Drugs Dermatol 2019; 18 (Suppl. 1s) s75-s79 PubMed (PMID: 30681814)
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Blair R, Gupta G. Impact of demographic and treatment-related factors. In: Davis SA, ed. Adherence in Dermatology. Cham: Springer International; 2016:17–28
  • 54 Newport F. In U.S., estimate of LGBT population rises to 4.5%. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/234863/estimate-lgbt-population-rises.aspx. Accessed February 23, 2019
  • 55 Yeung H, Luk KM, Chen SC, Ginsberg BA, Katz KA. Dermatologic care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender persons: terminology, demographics, health disparities, and approaches to care.. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 80 (3) 581-589 PubMed (PMID: 30744874)
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Yeung H, Luk KM, Chen SC, Ginsberg BA, Katz KA. Dermatologic care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender persons: epidemiology, screening, and disease prevention.. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 80 (3) 591-602 PubMed (PMID: 30744875)
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Montes JR, Santos E. Evaluation of men’s trends and experiences in aesthetic treatment.. J Drugs Dermatol 2018; 17 (9) 941-946 PubMed (PMID: 30235379)
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Yeung H, Chen SC. Sexual orientation and indoor tanning device use: a population-based study.. JAMA Dermatol 2016; 152 (1) 99-101 PubMed (PMID: 26244279)
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Mansh M, Katz KA, Linos E, Chren MM, Arron S. Association of skin cancer and indoor tanning in sexual minority men and women.. JAMA Dermatol 2015; 151 (12) 1308-1316 PubMed (PMID: 26444580)
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Klimek P, Lamb KM, Nogg KA, Rooney BM, Blashill AJ. Current and ideal skin tone: associations with tanning behavior among sexual minority men.. Body Image 2018; 25: 31-34 PubMed (PMID: 29438898)
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Admassu N, Pimentel MA, Halley MC et al. Motivations among sexual-minority men for starting and stopping indoor tanning.. Br J Dermatol 2019; 180 (6) 1529-1530 PubMed (PMID: 30671929)
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Wierckx K, Van de Peer F, Verhaeghe E et al. Short- and long-term clinical skin effects of testosterone treatment in trans men.. J Sex Med 2014; 11 (1) 222-229 PubMed (PMID: 24344810)
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Motosko CC, Zakhem GA, Pomeranz MK, Hazen A. Acne: a side-effect of masculinizing hormonal therapy in transgender patients.. Br J Dermatol 2019; 180 (1) 26-30 PubMed (PMID: 30101531)
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Nakamura A, Watanabe M, Sugimoto M et al. Dose-response analysis of testosterone replacement therapy in patients with female to male gender identity disorder.. Endocr J 2013; 60 (3) 275-281 PubMed (PMID: 23117148)
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Kontochristopoulos G, Platsidaki E. Chemical peels in active acne and acne scars.. Clin Dermatol 2017; 35 (2) 179-182 PubMed (PMID: 28274356)
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Tung R, Sato M, Kim N, Brenner FM. Body peeling. In: Tung RC, Rubin MG, eds. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Chemical Peels. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011:117–122
  • 67 Spring LK, Krakowski AC, Alam M et al. Isotretinoin and timing of procedural interventions: a systematic review with consensus recommendations.. JAMA Dermatol 2017; 153 (8) 802-809 PubMed (PMID: 28658462)
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Waldman A, Bolotin D, Arndt KA et al. ASDS guidelines task force: consensus recommendations regarding the safety of lasers, dermabrasion, chemical peels, energy devices, and skin surgery during and after isotretinoin use.. Dermatol Surg 2017; 43 (10) 1249-1262 PubMed (PMID: 28498204)
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Griffiths S, Murray SB, Dunn M, Blashill AJ. Anabolic steroid use among gay and bisexual men living in Australia and New Zealand: associations with demographics, body dissatisfaction, eating disorder psychopathology, and quality of life.. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 181: 170-176 PubMed (PMID: 29055822)
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Ip EJ, Yadao MA, Shah BM et al. Polypharmacy, infectious diseases, sexual behavior, and psychophysical health among anabolic steroid-using homosexual and heterosexual gym patrons in san francisco’s castro district.. Subst Use Misuse 2017; 52 (7) 959-968 PubMed (PMID: 28296533)
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Ip EJ, Barnett MJ, Tenerowicz MJ, Perry PJ. The anabolic 500 survey: characteristics of male users versus nonusers of anabolic-androgenic steroids for strength training.. Pharmacotherapy 2011; 31 (8) 757-766 PubMed (PMID: 21923602)
    Google Scholar
  • 72 Blashill AJ, Calzo JP, Griffiths S, Murray SB. Anabolic steroid misuse among US adolescent boys: disparities by sexual orientation and race/ethnicity.. Am J Public Health 2017; 107 (2) 319-321 PubMed (PMID: 27997246)
    Google Scholar
  • 73 Kouris A, Platsidaki E, Christodoulou C et al. Patients’ self-esteem before and after chemical peeling procedure.. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2018; 20 (4) 220-222 PubMed (PMID: 29286838)
    Google Scholar
  • 74 Obagi S, Niamtu J. Chemical peel. In: Joe Niamtu, ed. Cosmetic Facial Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018:732–755
  • 75 Duffy DM. Avoiding complications. In: Tung RC, Rubin MG, eds. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Chemical Peels. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011:151–172
  • 76 Wambier CG, de Freitas FP. Combining phenol-croton oil peel. In: Issa MCA, Tamura B, eds. Chemical and Physical Procedures. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018:101–113
  • 77 Landau M. Cardiac complications in deep chemical peels.. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33 (2) 190-193, discussion 193 PubMed (PMID: 17300604)
    Google Scholar
  • 78 Landau M, Bensimon RH. Chemical peels. In: Cantisano-Zilkha M, Haddad A, eds. Aesthetic Oculofacial Rejuvenation. New York, NY: Elsevier; 2010:29–37
  • 79 Obagi S. Niamtu J. Chemical peel. In: Niamtu J, ed. Cosmetic Facial Surgery. 2nd ed. Beijing, China: Elsevier; 2018:732–755
  • 80 Resnik BI. The role of priming the skin for peels. In: Tung R, Rubin M, eds. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Chemical Peels. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011:23–25
  • 82 Lee KC, Wambier CG, Soon SL et al. Basic chemical peeling: superficial and medium-depth peels.. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 81 (2) 313-324 (PMID: NOT_FOUND)
    Google Scholar
  • 83 . Guidelines for chemical peeling in japan (3rd edition).. J Dermatol 2012; 39 (Suppl. 4) 321-325
    Google Scholar
  • 84 Khunger N, . Standard guidelines of care for chemical peels.. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008; 74 (Suppl. Suppl) S5-S12 PubMed (PMID: 18688104)
    Google Scholar
  • 85 Ditre CM. Alpha-hydroxy acid peels. In: Tung RC, Rubin MG, eds. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Chemical Peels. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011:27–40
  • 87 Sarkar R, Gokhale N, Godse K et al. Medical management of melasma: a review with consensus recommendations by Indian pigmentary expert group.. Indian J Dermatol 2017; 62 (6) 558-577 PubMed (PMID: 29263529)
    Google Scholar
  • 88 Mancuso JB, Maruthi R, Wang SQ, Lim HW. Sunscreens: an update.. Am J Clin Dermatol 2017; 18 (5) 643-650 PubMed (PMID: 28510141)
    Google Scholar
  • 89 Peikert JM, Krywonis NA, Rest EB, Zachary CB. The efficacy of various degreasing agents used in trichloroacetic acid peels.. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1994; 20 (11) 724-728 PubMed (PMID: 7962931)
    Google Scholar
  • 90 Leonhardt JM, Rossy KM, Lawrence N. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) peels. In: Tung RC, Rubin MG, eds. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Chemical Peels. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011: 64.
  • 91 Leonhardt JM, Rossy KM, Lawrence N. Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) peels. In: Tung RC, Rubin MG, eds. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Chemical Peels. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011: 66–67.
  • 92 Coleman KM, Coleman WP. Complications. In: Tung RC, Rubin MG, eds. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Chemical Peels. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011:173–182
  • 93 Perkins SW, Waters HH. Management of aging skin. In: Flint PW, Haughey BH, Lund V, et al., eds. Cummings Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2015:391–408
  • 94 Hetter GP. An examination of the phenol-croton oil peel: part IV. Face peel results with different concentrations of phenol and croton oil.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (3) 1061-1083, discussion 1084–1087 PubMed (PMID: 10724270)
    Google Scholar
  • 95 Rullan P, Karam AM. Chemical peels for darker skin types.. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2010; 18 (1) 111-131 PubMed (PMID: 20206095)
    Google Scholar
  • 97 Reserva J, Champlain A, Soon SL, Tung R. Chemical peels: indications and special considerations for the male patient.. Dermatol Surg 2017; 43 (Suppl. Suppl 2) S163-S173 PubMed (PMID: 28902026)
    Google Scholar
  • 99 Grimes PE. Salicylic acid peels. In: Tung R, Rubin M, eds. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Chemical Peels. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011:41–47
  • 100 Dainichi T, Ueda S, Imayama S, Furue M. Excellent clinical results with a new preparation for chemical peeling in acne: 30% salicylic acid in polyethylene glycol vehicle.. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34 (7) 891-899, discussion 899 PubMed (PMID: 18363720)
    Google Scholar
  • 101 Dainichi T, Amano S, Matsunaga Y et al. Chemical peeling by SA-PEG remodels photo-damaged skin: suppressing p53 expression and normalizing keratinocyte differentiation.. J Invest Dermatol 2006; 126 (2) 416-421 PubMed (PMID: 16374463)
    Google Scholar
  • 102 Grimes PE. Jessner’s solution. In: Tosti A, Grimes PE, De Padova MP, eds. Color Atlas of Chemical Peels. Berlin: Springer; 2006:23–29
  • 103 Ghersetich I, Brazzini B, Lotti T, De Padova MP, Tosti A. Resorcinol. In: Tosti A, Grimes PE, De Padova MP, eds. Color of Atlas of Chemical Peels. Berlin: Springer; 2006:41–47
  • 104 Rubin C. Are you man enough for a peel? The New York Times. January 22, 2015;E; Style Desk; SKIN DEEP:4
  • 105 Moy LS, Peace S, Moy RL. Comparison of the effect of various chemical peeling agents in a mini-pig model.. Dermatol Surg 1996; 22 (5) 429-432 PubMed (PMID: 8634804)
    Google Scholar
  • 106 Becker FF, Langford FP, Rubin MG, Speelman P. A histological comparison of 50% and 70% glycolic acid peels using solutions with various pHs.. Dermatol Surg 1996; 22 (5) 463-465 PubMed (PMID: 8634810)
    Google Scholar
  • 107 Cohen BJ. The value of pH. Aesthetics. 2014. Available at: https://aestheticsjournal.com/feature/the-value-of-ph. Accessed February 24, 2019
  • 108 Sharad J. Glycolic acid peel therapy: a current review.. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2013; 6: 281-288 PubMed (PMID: 24399880)
    Google Scholar
  • 109 Bagatin E, Teixeira SP, Hassun KM, Pereira T, Michalany NS, Talarico S. 5-Fluorouracil superficial peel for multiple actinic keratoses.. Int J Dermatol 2009; 48 (8) 902-907 PubMed (PMID: 19659874)
    Google Scholar
  • 110 Marrero GM, Katz BE. The new fluor-hydroxy pulse peel. A combination of 5-fluorouracil and glycolic acid.. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24 (9) 973-978 PubMed (PMID: 9754085)
    Google Scholar
  • 111 Harmon CB, Hadley M, Tristani P. Tricholoroacetic acid. In: Tosti A, Grimes PE, De Padova MP, eds. Color atlas of Chemical Peels. Berlin: Springer; 2006:59–67
  • 113 Fabbrocini G, De Padova MP, Tosti A. Superficial to medium-depth peels: a personal experience. In: Tung RC, Rubin MG, eds. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Chemical Peels. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011:123–132
  • 114 Cho SB, Chung KY, Lee KH, Lee JB. Chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) technique. In: Tung RC, Rubin MG, eds. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Chemical Peels. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2011:101–107
  • 115 Lee JB, Chung WG, Kwahck H, Lee KH. Focal treatment of acne scars with trichloroacetic acid: chemical reconstruction of skin scars method.. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28 (11) 1017-1021, discussion 1021 PubMed (PMID: 12460296)
    Google Scholar
  • 116 Khunger N, Bhardwaj D, Khunger M. Evaluation of CROSS technique with 100% TCA in the management of ice pick acne scars in darker skin types.. J Cosmet Dermatol 2011; 10 (1) 51-57 PubMed (PMID: 21332915)
    Google Scholar
  • 117 Leheta T, El Tawdy A, Abdel Hay R, Farid S. Percutaneous collagen induction versus full-concentration trichloroacetic acid in the treatment of atrophic acne scars.. Dermatol Surg 2011; 37 (2) 207-216 PubMed (PMID: 21269351)
    Google Scholar
  • 118 Jacobs B. Is men’s make-up going mainstream? Available at: http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20190206-is-mens-make-up-going-mainstream. Updated 2019. Accessed March 12, 2019
  • 119 Wolfson S. Face time: is makeup for men the next big beauty trend? The Guardian Web site. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2018/oct/13/makeup-for-men-beauty-trend. Updated 2018. Accessed March 12, 2019
  • 120 Jung K, Choi M, Hong S et al. Realistic and aggregated exposure assessment of Korean men and women to color make-up products.. Food Chem Toxicol 2018; 118: 382-389 PubMed (PMID: 29758314)
    Google Scholar
  • 121 Hetter GP. An examination of the phenol-croton oil peel: part I. Dissecting the formula.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (1) 227-239, discussion 249–251 PubMed (PMID: 10626996)
    Google Scholar
  • 122 Sterling JB. Micropunch blepharopeeling of the upper eyelids: a combination approach for periorbital rejuvenation–a pilot study.. Dermatol Surg 2014; 40 (4) 436-440 PubMed (PMID: 24479728)
    Google Scholar
  • 123 Hetter GP, Brody HJ, Monheit GD, Landau M. Interactive peeling session. Proceedings from the International Peeling Society’s Chemical Peel Course: International Day at the American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting. Orlando, FL, March 2, 2017
  • 124 Chisaki C, Horn G, Noriega LF. Phenol solutions for deep peels. In: Issa MCA, Tamura B, eds. Chemical and Physical Procedures. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018:73–99
  • 125 Office of Environmental Health & Safety. Phenol safety fact sheet. Available at: https://ehs.usc.edu/files/phenol-fact-sheet.pdf. Updated 2018. Accessed March 12, 2019
  • 126 Wambier CG, Beltrame FL. Air safety and personal protective equipment for phenol-croton oil peels.. Dermatol Surg 2018; 44 (7) 1035-1037 PubMed (PMID: 29077632)
    Google Scholar
  • 127 Linder J. Chemical peels and combination therapies.. Plast Surg Nurs 2013; 33 (2) 88-91, quiz 92–93 PubMed (PMID: 23727725)
    Google Scholar
  • 128 Taylor MB, Zaleski-Larsen L, McGraw TA. Single session treatment of rolling acne scars using tumescent anesthesia, 20% trichloracetic acid extensive subcision, and fractional CO2 laser.. Dermatol Surg 2017; 43 (Suppl. Suppl 1) S70-S74 PubMed (PMID: 27631461)
    Google Scholar
  • 129 Tung R, Mahoney AM, Novice K et al. Treatment of lateral canthal rhytides with a medium depth chemical peel with or without pretreatment with onabotulinum toxin type A: a randomized control trial.. Int J Womens Dermatol 2016; 2 (1) 31-34 PubMed (PMID: 28491999)
    Google Scholar
  • 130 Landau M. Combination of chemical peelings with botulinum toxin injections and dermal fillers.. J Cosmet Dermatol 2006; 5 (2) 121-126 PubMed (PMID: 17173585)
    Google Scholar
  • 131 Quaedvlieg PJF, Ostertag JU, Krekels GA, Neumann HAM. Delayed wound healing after three different treatments for widespread actinic keratosis on the atrophic bald scalp.. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29 (10) 1052-1056, discussion 1056 PubMed (PMID: 12974704)
    Google Scholar
  • 132 Champlain A, Reserva J, Webb K et al. Cosmetic dermatology training during residency: outcomes of a resident-reported survey.. Dermatol Surg 2018; 44 (9) 1216-1219 PubMed (PMID: 29781906)
    Google Scholar