Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review

Background To date, there are no consensus guidelines for management of lymphatic leak in groin vascular reconstruction patients. The goal of this study is to review the relevant literature to determine alternatives for treatment and to design an evidence-based algorithm to minimize cost and morbidity and maximize efficacy.

Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Two independent reviewers applied agreed-upon inclusion and exclusion criteria to eligible records. Studies that included patients who underwent groin dissection for oncologic diagnoses and level 5 data were excluded. Interventions were then categorized by efficacy using predetermined criteria.

Results Our search yielded 333 records, of which eight studies were included. In four studies, the success of lymphatic ligation ranged from 75% to 100%, with average days to resolution ranging from 0 to 9. Conservative management in the form of elevation, compression, and bedrest may prolong time to resolution of lymphatic leak (14–24 days) and therefore cost.

Conclusions The majority of patients should be offered early operative intervention in the form of lymphatic ligation with or without a primary muscle flap. If the patient is not an operative candidate, a trial of conservative management should be attempted before other nonsurgical interventions.

Keywords

Lymph - Lymphorrhea - Algorithms - Blood vessel prosthesis

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 22. Oktober 2020

Angenommen: 25. Mai 2021

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. März 2022

• REFERENCES

• 1 Kent KC, Bartek S, Kuntz KM. et al. Prospective study of wound complications in continuous infrainguinal incisions after lower limb arterial reconstruction: incidence, risk factors, and cost. Surgery 1996; 119: 378-83
• 2 Lv S, Wang Q, Zhao W. et al. A review of the postoperative lymphatic leakage. Oncotarget 2017; 08: 69062-75
• 3 Tyndall SH, Shepard AD, Wilczewski JM. et al. Groin lymphatic complications after arterial reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 1994; 19: 858-64
• 4 Soderman M, Thomsen JB, Sorensen JA. Complications following inguinal and ilioinguinal lymphadenectomies: a meta-analysis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2016; 50: 315-20
• 5 Pejkic S, Dragas M, Ilic N. et al. Incidence and relevance of groin incisional complications after aortobifemoral bypass grafting. Ann Vasc Surg 2014; 28: 1832-9
• 6 Obara A, Dziekiewicz MA, Maruszynski M. et al. Lymphatic complications after vascular interventions. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2014; 09: 420-6
• 7 Parikh PP, Rubio GA, Patel K. et al. Transverse versus longitudinal incisions for femoral artery exposure in treating patients with peripheral vascular disease. Ann Vasc Surg 2018; 47: 143-8
• 8 Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Rohrbach JI. et al. Prophylactic muscle flaps in vascular surgery: the Penn Groin Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 940e-949e
• 9 Healy DA, Keyser 3rd J, Holcomb 3rd GW. et al. Prophylactic closed suction drainage of femoral wounds in patients undergoing vascular reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 1989; 10: 166-08
• 10 Dunlop MG, Fox JN, Stonebridge PA. et al. Vacuum drainage of groin wounds after vascular surgery: a controlled trial. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 562-03
• 11 Weaver FA, Yellin AE. Management of postoperative lymphatic leaks by use of isosulphan blue. J Vasc Surg 1991; 14: 566-07
• 12 Schwartz MA, Schanzer H, Skladany M. et al. A comparison of conservative therapy and early selective ligation in the treatment of lymphatic complications following vascular procedures. Am J Surg 1995; 170: 206-08
• 13 Greer SE, Adelman M, Kasabian A. et al. The use of subatmospheric pressure dressing therapy to close lymphocutaneous fistulas of the groin. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53: 484-07
• 14 Smolock AR, Nadolski G, Itkin M. Intranodal glue embolization for the management of postsurgical groin lymphocele and lymphorrhea. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29: 1462-05
• 15 al-Salman MM, Rabee H, Shibli S. Groin lymphorrhea postoperative nuisance. Int Surg 1997; 82: 60-2
• 16 Bounds MC, Endean ED. Treatment of postoperative highvolume lymphatic complications using isosulfan blue. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2018; 06: 737-40
• 17 Shermak MA, Yee K, Wong L. et al. Surgical management of groin lymphatic complications after arterial bypass surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 1954-62
• 18 Van den Brande P, von Kemp K, Aerden D. et al. Treatment of lymphocutaneous fistulas after vascular procedures of the lower limb: accurate wound reclosure and 3 weeks of consistent and continuing drainage. Ann Vasc Surg 2012; 26: 833-08
• 19 Szilagyi DE, Smith RF, Elliott JP. et al. Infection in arterial reconstruction with synthetic grafts. Ann Surg 1972; 176: 321-33
• 20 Giacalone G, Yamamoto T, Hayashi A. et al. Lymphatic supermicrosurgery for the treatment of recurrent lymphocele and severe lymphorrhea. Microsurgery 2019; 39: 326-31