Robot-Assisted Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction

Background Robots have allowed head and neck surgeons to extirpate oropharyngeal tumors safely without the need for lip-split incision or mandibulotomy. Using robots in oropharyngeal reconstruction is new but essential for oropharyngeal defects that result from robotic tumor excision. We report our experience with robotic free-flap reconstruction of head and neck defects to exemplify the necessity for robotic reconstruction.

Methods We investigated head and neck cancer patients who underwent ablation surgery and free-flap reconstruction by robot. Between July 1, 2011 and March 31, 2012, 5 cases were performed and patient demographics, location of tumor, pathologic stage, reconstruction methods, flap size, recipient vessel, necessary pedicle length, and operation time were investigated.

Results Among five free-flap reconstructions, four were radial forearm free flaps and one was an anterolateral thigh free-flap. Four flaps used the superior thyroid artery and one flap used a facial artery as the recipient vessel. The average pedicle length was 8.8 cm. Flap insetting and microanastomosis were achieved using a specially manufactured robotic instrument. The total operation time was 1,041.0 minutes (range, 814 to 1,132 minutes), and complications including flap necrosis, hematoma, and wound dehiscence did not occur.

Conclusions This study demonstrates the clinically applicable use of robots in oropharyngeal reconstruction, especially using a free flap. A robot can assist the operator in insetting the flap at a deep portion of the oropharynx without the need to perform a traditional mandibulotomy. Robot-assisted reconstruction may substitute for existing surgical methods and is accepted as the most up-to-date method.

Keywords

Robotics - Free tissue flaps - Head and neck neoplasms

This article was presented at the the 2nd Research & Reconstructive Forum on June 1-2, 2012 in Gwangju, Korea.

Publication History

Received: 18 February 2013

Accepted: 26 April 2013

Article published online:
01 May 2022

• References

• 1 Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 1305-1312
• 2 Aubry K, Yachine M, Perez AF. et al. Transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer: a series of 17 cases. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2011; 128: 290-296
• 3 Park YM, Kim WS, Byeon HK. et al. Oncological and functional outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51: 408-412
• 4 Park YM, Kim WS, De Virgilio A. et al. Transoral robotic surgery for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: 3-year oncologic and functional analysis. Oral Oncol 2012; 48: 560-566
• 5 Hurtuk AM, Marcinow A, Agrawal A. et al. Quality-of-life outcomes in transoral robotic surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 146: 68-73
• 6 Genden EM, Desai S, Sung CK. Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck cancer: a preliminary experience. Head Neck 2009; 31: 283-289
• 7 Kim WS, Lee HS, Kang SM. et al. Feasibility of robot-assisted neck dissections via a transaxillary and retroauricular ("TARA") approach in head and neck cancer: preliminary results. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 1009-1017
• 8 Lee HS, Kim WS, Hong HJ. et al. Robot-assisted Supraomohyoid neck dissection via a modified face-lift or retroauricular approach in early-stage cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a comparative study with conventional technique. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 3871-3878
• 9 Selber JC. Transoral robotic reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 1978-1987
• 10 Park YM, Holsinger FC, Kim WS. et al. Robot-assisted selective neck dissection of levels II to V via a modified facelift or retroauricular approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148: 778-785