Thickness of Rectus Abdominis Muscle and Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat Tissue in Adult Women: Correlation with Age, Pregnancy, Laparotomy, and Body Mass Index

Background Rectus abdominis muscle and abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue are useful for reconstruction of the chest wall, and abdominal, vaginal, and perianal defects. Thus, preoperative evaluation of rectus abdominis muscle and abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue is important. This is a retrospective study that measured the thickness of rectus abdominis muscle and abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue using computed tomography (CT) and analyzed the correlation with the patients' age, gestational history, history of laparotomy, and body mass index (BMI).

Methods A total of 545 adult women were studied. Rectus abdominis muscle and abdominal subcutaneous fat thicknesses were measured with abdominopelvic CT. The results were analyzed to determine if the thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle or subcutaneous fat tissue was significantly correlated with age, number of pregnancies, history of laparotomy, and BMI.

Results Rectus abdominis muscle thicknesses were 9.58 mm (right) and 9.73 mm (left) at the xiphoid level and 10.26 mm (right) and 10.26 mm (left) at the umbilicus level. Subcutaneous fat thicknesses were 24.31 mm (right) and 23.39 mm (left). Rectus abdominismuscle thickness decreased with age and pregnancy. History of laparotomy had a significant negative correlation with rectus abdominis muscle thickness at the xiphoid level. Abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness had no correlation with age, number of pregnancies, or history of laparotomy.

Conclusions Age, gestational history, and history of laparotomy influenced rectus abdominis muscle thickness but did not influence abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness. These results are clinically valuable for planning a rectus abdominis muscle flap and safe elevation of muscle flap.

Keywords

Rectus abdominis - Age - Pregnancy - Laparotomy - Body mass index

Publication History

Received: 05 May 2012

Accepted: 04 August 2012

Article published online:
01 May 2022

• REFERENCES

• 1 Mathes SJ, Bostwick 3rd J. A rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap to reconstruct abdominal wall defects. Br J Plast Surg 1977; 30: 282-283
• 2 Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69: 216-225
• 3 Parrett BM, Winograd JM, Garfein ES. et al. The vertical and extended rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for irradiated thigh and groin defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 171-177
• 4 Nelson RA, Butler CE. Surgical outcomes of VRAM versus thigh flaps for immediate reconstruction of pelvic and perineal cancer resection defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 175-183
• 5 Buck 2nd DW, Fine NA. The pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 1047-1054
• 6 Phillips TJ, Stella DL, Rozen WM. et al. Abdominal wall CT angiography: a detailed account of a newly established preoperative imaging technique. Radiology 2008; 249: 32-44
• 7 Suh IS, Bang RS, Park KN. et al. Analysis of subcutaneous tissue thickness of the flap donor sites by ultrasonography. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 19: 529-537
• 8 Rankin G, Stokes M, Newham DJ. Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 2006; 34: 320-326
• 9 Kanehisa H, Miyatani M, Azuma K. et al. Influences of age and sex on abdominal muscle and subcutaneous fat thickness. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 91: 534-537
• 10 Moran SL, Serletti JM. Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 1954-1960