Background and Study Aims: The aim of the study was to compare two steerable endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) catheters with regard to speed and safety in cannulating the common bile duct. Patients and Methods: A standard cannula, a short-nosed sphincterotome, and a bendable catheter were used. At two tertiary centres, a total of 312 patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with one of three catheters and either by a trainee or an expert endoscopist. When cannulation failed, a further attempt was made with a different catheter. If this failed, a change in operator or other manoeuvres followed. The following were assessed: time to cholangiography and deep cannulation, number of attempts and success rates of cannulation, number of pancreatic duct injections, success of catheter cross-over, and complication rates. Results: Both steerable catheters were significantly better for the initial cholangiogram than the standard catheter (standard catheter 75 %, bendable catheter 84 %, sphincterotome 88 %; P = 0.038), with no significant differences between the bendable catheter and the sphincterotome. Both were also better for deep cannulation of the bile duct (standard cannula 66 %, bendable catheter 69 %, sphincterotome 78 %; P = 0.15). When the standard catheter failed, a steerable catheter succeeded in 26 % of cases. Trainees experienced greater benefit from using steerable catheters. For experts, the bendable catheter was the quickest to achieve cholangiography and deep cannulation. Further manoeuvres had an 85-90 % success rate in allowing biliary access. Twenty of 23 needle-knife papillotomies (87 %) were successful when other methods had failed. The overall ERCP success rate was 97 %. Pancreatitis occurred in 5.3 % of cases. Conclusions: Steerable catheters allow faster access and can succeed when a standard catheter fails. If cannulation is difficult, changing the catheter should be considered at an early stage. Needle-knife papillotomy is a successful technique in expert hands.
References
1
Deans G T, Sedman P, Martin D F. et al .
Are complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy age-related?.
Gut.
1997;
41
545-548
3
Christoforidis E, Goulimaris I, Kanellos I. et al .
Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: patient-related and operative risk factors.
Endoscopy.
2002;
34
286-292
5
Freeman M L, DiSario J A, Nelson D B. et al .
Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
54
425-434
6
Rossos P G, Kortan P, Haber G.
Selective common bile duct cannulation can be simplified by the use of a standard papillotome.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1993;
39
67-69
7
Cortas G A, Mehta S N, Abraham N S. et al .
Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
50
775-779
8
Schwacha H, Allgaier H P, Deibert P. et al .
A sphincterotome-based technique for selective transpapillary common bile duct cannulation.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2000;
52
387-391
14
Seifert H, Binmoeller K F, Schmitt T. et al .
A new papillotome for cannulation, pre-cut or conventional papillotomy (in German).
Z Gastroenterol.
1999;
37
1151-1155
16
Weston A P.
Sincalide: a cholecystokinin agonist as an aid in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography - a prospective assessment.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1997;
24
227-230
17
Binmoeller K F, Seifert H, Gerke H. et al .
Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type pre-cut papillotome to achieve selective bile duct cannulation.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1996;
44
689-695
20
Taylor A C, Little A F, Hennessy O F. et al .
Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
55
17-22
22
Fogel E L, Sherman S, Lehman G A.
Increased selective biliary cannulation rates in the setting of periampullary diverticula: main pancreatic duct stent placement followed by pre-cut biliary sphincterotomy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1998;
47
396-400
24
Dhir V, Swaroop V S, Mohandas K M. et al .
Precut papillotomy using a needle knife: experience in 100 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice.
Indian J Gastroenterol.
1997;
16
52-53
25
Bruins S lot, Schoeman M N, Disario J A. et al .
Needle-knife sphincterotomy as a precut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications.
Endoscopy.
1996;
28
334-339
26
Foutch P G.
A prospective assessment of results for needle-knife papillotomy and standard endoscopic sphincterotomy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1995;
41
25-32
29
Kasmin F E, Cohen D, Batra S. et al .
Needle-knife sphincterotomy in a tertiary referral center: efficacy and complications.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1996;
44
48-53
30
Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Romanos A. et al .
Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife precut papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
50
334-339
31
Rollhauser C, Johnson M, Al-Kawas F H.
Needle-knife papillotomy: a helpful and safe adjunct to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a selected population.
Endoscopy.
1998;
30
691-696
34
Gholson C F, Favrot D.
Needle knife papillotomy in a university referral practice: safety and efficacy of a modified technique.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
1996;
23
177-180
