Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12(03): 573-581
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731339
Research Article

Patient Portals: Useful for Whom and for What? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of National Survey Data

Christine M. Swoboda
1   CATALYST–The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Matthew J. DePuccio
1   CATALYST–The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Naleef Fareed
1   CATALYST–The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
2   Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Ann Scheck McAlearney
1   CATALYST–The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
3   Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Daniel M. Walker
1   CATALYST–The Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
3   Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, Columbus, Ohio, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Patients who use patient portals may be more engaged and empowered in their care; however, differences in who accesses patient portals remain. The characteristics of who uses patient portals more frequently and who perceives them as useful may also differ, as well as which functions people use.

Objective We assessed the characteristics of patient portal users to examine who uses them more frequently and who perceives them as useful. In addition, we wanted to see if those who use them more frequently or perceive them to be more useful use different functions or more functions of patient portals.

Methods Pooled cross-sectional data from 2017 to 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) were used. Ordinal regression models were developed to assess frequency of use and perceived usefulness by demographics, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between the use of 10 patient portal functions and frequency of use and perceived usefulness of patient portals.

Results The odds of using patient portals more frequently were higher among those with Bachelor's degrees, incomes between $35,000 and $75,000, and those with two or more chronic conditions. Respondents with three or more chronic conditions had higher odds of rating patient portals as useful. Those who used their patient portal 10 or more times in the past year had higher odds of using all functions except for viewing test results compared with those who used their patient portal one to two times per year. Those who rated patient portals as “very useful” had higher odds of using seven of the functions compared with those who rated them “not very”/“not at all useful.”

Conclusion It is important to continue to assess usefulness, frequency of use, and overall patient portal function use to identify opportunities to increase patient engagement with patient portals.

Keywords

patient portals - electronic health record - surveys and questionnaires - public health surveillance

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This study uses publicly available deidentified data from a national survey. No human or animal subjects were included in this project.




Publication History

Received: 14 February 2021

Accepted: 15 May 2021

Article published online:
07 July 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Burde H. Health Law the hitech act-an overview. Virtual Mentor 2011; 13 (03) 172-175
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Lye CT, Forman HP, Daniel JG, Krumholz HM. The 21st Century Cures Act and electronic health records one year later: will patients see the benefits?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (09) 1218-1220
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Burke RP, Rossi AF, Wilner BR, Hannan RL, Zabinsky JA, White JA. Transforming patient and family access to medical information: utilisation patterns of a patient-accessible electronic health record. Cardiol Young 2010; 20 (05) 477-484
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Huerta T, Fareed N, Hefner JL. et al. Patient engagement as measured by inpatient portal use: methodology for log file analysis. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (03) e10957
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Ford EW, Hesse BW, Huerta TR. Personal health record use in the united states: Forecasting future adoption levels. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (03) e73
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Jones JB, Weiner JP, Shah NR, Stewart WF. The wired patient: patterns of electronic patient portal use among patients with cardiac disease or diabetes. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (02) e42
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Irizarry T, DeVito Dabbs A, Curran CR. Patient portals and patient engagement: A state of the science review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (06) e148
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Assadi V, Hassanein K. Consumer adoption of personal health record systems: a self-determination theory perspective. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (07) e270
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Shimada SL, Allison JJ, Rosen AK, Feng H, Houston TK. Sustained use of patient portal features and improvements in diabetes physiological measures. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (07) e179
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Mold F, Raleigh M, Alharbi NS, de Lusignan S. The impact of patient online access to computerized medical records and services on type 2 diabetes: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (07) e235
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Tulu B, Trudel J, Strong DM, Johnson SA, Sundaresan D, Garber L. Patient portals: an underused resource for improving patient engagement. Chest 2016; 149 (01) 272-277
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kelly MM, Hoonakker PL, Dean SM. Using an inpatient portal to engage families in pediatric hospital care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (01) 153-161
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Otte-Trojel T, Rundall TG, de Bont A, van de Klundert J, Reed ME. The organizational dynamics enabling patient portal impacts upon organizational performance and patient health: a qualitative study of Kaiser Permanente. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15: 559
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 United States Government Accountability Office. Health information technology: Hhs should assess the effectiveness of its efforts to enhance patient access to and use of electronic health information GAO-17–305. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-17-305 Accessed March 15, 2017
    PubMed
  • 15 Fraccaro P, Vigo M, Balatsoukas P, Buchan IE, Peek N, van der Veer SN. Patient portal adoption rates: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 245: 79-83
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 El-Toukhy S, Méndez A, Collins S, Pérez-Stable EJ. Barriers to patient portal access and use: evidence from the health information national trends survey. J Am Board Fam Med 2020; 33 (06) 953-968
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Anthony DL, Campos-Castillo C, Lim PS. Who isn't using patient portals and why? Evidence and implications from a national sample of us adults. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018; 37 (12) 1948-1954
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Walker DM, Hefner JL, Fareed N, Huerta TR, McAlearney AS. Exploring the digital divide: age and race disparities in use of an inpatient portal. Telemed J E Health 2020; 26 (05) 603-613
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Tsai R, Bell III EJ, Woo H, Baldwin K, Pfeffer MA. How patients use a patient portal: an institutional case study of demographics and usage patterns. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 96-102
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Bush RA, Vemulakonda VM, Richardson AC, Deakyne Davies SJ, Chiang GJ. Providing access: differences in pediatric portal activation begin at patient check-in. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (04) 670-678
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Tieu L, Sarkar U, Schillinger D. et al. Barriers and facilitators to online portal use among patients and caregivers in a safety net health care system: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (12) e275
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Lin SC, Lyles CR, Sarkar U, Adler-Milstein J. Are patients electronically accessing their medical records? Evidence from national hospital data. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019; 38 (11) 1850-1857
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Maguire M. Context of use within usability activities. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2001; 55 (04) 453-483
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th edition. New York: Free Press; 2003
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Emani S, Peters E, Desai S. et al. Who adopts a patient portal?: an application of the diffusion of innovation model. J Innov Health Inform 2018; 25 (03) 149-157
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Lin CT, Wittevrongel L, Moore L, Beaty BL, Ross SE. An Internet-based patient-provider communication system: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2005; 7 (04) e47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 National Cancer Institute. Hints survey instruments. Accessed February 27, 2020 at: http://hints.cancer.gov/instrument.aspx
    PubMed
  • 28 National Cancer Institute. Frequently asked questions about hints. Accessed February 12, 2020 at: http://hints.cancer.gov/faq.aspx
    PubMed
  • 29 Davis W, Moser RP. Discussion of statistical weights and their use. 2004 Accessed 2004 at: https://hints.cancer.gov/docs/Using-Survey-Weights12-13-05.pdf
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Moser RP, Naveed S, Cantor D. et al. Integrative analytic methods using population-level cross-sectional data. In: National Cancer Institute; 2013
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Goel MS, Brown TL, Williams A, Hasnain-Wynia R, Thompson JA, Baker DW. Disparities in enrollment and use of an electronic patient portal. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26 (10) 1112-1116
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Wallace LS, Angier H, Huguet N. et al. Patterns of electronic portal use among vulnerable patients in a nationwide practice-based research network: From the ochin practice-based research network (pbrn). J Am Board Fam Med 2016; 29 (05) 592-603
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Elston Lafata J, Miller CA, Shires DA, Dyer K, Ratliff SM, Schreiber M. Patients' adoption of and feature access within electronic patient portals. Am J Manag Care 2018; 24 (11) e352-e357
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Turvey C, Klein D, Fix G. et al. Blue Button use by patients to access and share health record information using the Department of Veterans Affairs' online patient portal. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (04) 657-663
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Turner AM, Osterhage K, Hartzler A. et al. Use of patient portals for personal health information management: the older adult perspective. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2015; 2015: 1234-1241
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Powell K, Myers C. Electronic patient portals: Patient and provider perceptions. Online J Nurs Inform 2018;22(01):
    PubMed
  • 37 Irizarry T, Shoemake J, Nilsen ML, Czaja S, Beach S, DeVito Dabbs A. Patient portals as a tool for health care engagement: a mixed-method study of older adults with varying levels of health literacy and prior patient portal use. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (03) e99
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Woods SS, Forsberg CW, Schwartz EC. et al. The association of patient factors, digital access, and online behavior on sustained patient portal use: a prospective cohort of enrolled users. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (10) e345
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Hoogenbosch B, Postma J, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Tiemessen NA, van Delden JJ, van Os-Medendorp H. Use and the users of a patient portal: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (09) e262
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Mackert M, Mabry-Flynn A, Champlin S, Donovan EE, Pounders K. Health literacy and health information technology adoption: the potential for a new digital divide. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (10) e264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Sulieman L, Steitz B, Rosenbloom ST. Analysis of employee patient portal use and electronic health record access at an academic medical center. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (03) 433-441
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Antonio MG, Petrovskaya O, Lau F. Is research on patient portals attuned to health equity? A scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (8-9): 871-883
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Kornacker D, Fitzgerald K, Elder S. A patient portal push toward acceptance and utilization of the technology. Patient Exp J 2019; 6 (02) 20-27
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 McAlearney AS, Gaughan A, MacEwan SR, Fareed N, Huerta TR. Improving acceptance of inpatient portals: patients' and care team members' perspectives. Telemed J E Health 2020; 26 (03) 310-326
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Czaja SJ, Zarcadoolas C, Vaughon WL, Lee CC, Rockoff ML, Levy J. The usability of electronic personal health record systems for an underserved adult population. Hum Factors 2015; 57 (03) 491-506
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Sarkar U, Lyles CR, Parker MM. et al. Use of the refill function through an online patient portal is associated with improved adherence to statins in an integrated health system. Med Care 2014; 52 (03) 194-201
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Graham TAD, Ali S, Avdagovska M, Ballermann M. Effects of a web-based patient portal on patient satisfaction and missed appointment rates: Survey study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (05) e17955
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Dendere R, Slade C, Burton-Jones A, Sullivan C, Staib A, Janda M. Patient portals facilitating engagement with inpatient electronic medical records: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21 (04) e12779
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Casey I. The effect of education on portal personal health record use. Online J Nurs Inform 2016; 20 (02) 9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Lyles CR, Tieu L, Sarkar U. et al. A randomized trial to train vulnerable primary care patients to use a patient portal. J Am Board Fam Med 2019; 32 (02) 248-258
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar