Gender disparities in advanced endoscopy fellowship

Abstract

Background and study aims Women remain underrepresented in gastroenterology, especially advanced endoscopy. Women represent 30 % of general gastroenterology fellows; yet in 2019, only 12.8 % of fellows who matched into advanced endoscopy fellowship (AEF) programs were women.

Methods We administered a web-based survey to the program directors (PDs) of AEF programs that participated in the 2018–2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) match. We assessed PD and program characteristics, in addition to perceived barriers and facilitators (scale 1–5, 5 = most important) influencing women pursuing AEF training.

Results We received 38 (59.3 %) responses from 64 PDs. 15.8 % (6/38) of AEF PDs and 13.2 % (5/38) of endoscopy chiefs were women. By program, women represented 14.8 % (mean) ± 17.0 % (SD) of AEF faculty and 12.0 % (mean) ± 11.1 % (SD) of AEF trainees over the past 10 years. 47.4 % (18/38) programs reported no female advanced endoscopy faculty and 31.6 % (12/38) of programs have never had a female fellow. Percentage of female fellows was strongly associated with percentage of female AEF faculty (ß = 0.43, P < 0.001). Inflexible hours and call (mean rank 3.3 ± 1.1), exposure to fluoroscopy (2.9 ± 1.1), lack of women endoscopists at national conferences/courses (2.9 ± 1.1) and lack of female mentorship (2.9 ± 1.0) were cited as the most important barriers to recruitment.

Conclusion We utilized a survey of AEF PDs participating in the ASGE match to determine program characteristics and identify contributors to gender disparity. Women represent a minority of AEF PDs, endoscopy chiefs, advanced endoscopy faculty and AEF trainees. Our study highlights perceived barriers and facilitators to recruitment, and emphasizes the importance of having female representation in faculty, and leadership positions in endoscopy.

Publication History

Received: 04 July 2020

Accepted: 07 October 2020

Article published online:
18 February 2021

• References

• 1 ACGME Residents and Fellows by Sex and Specialty. 2017 Available from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/acgme-residents-and-fellows-sex-and-specialty-2017
• 2 Pollack MJ, Cummings LC, Wong RC. et al. Gender disparities and gastroenterology trainee attitudes toward advanced endoscopic training. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1111
• 3 Nielsen MW, Alegria S, Borjeson L. et al. Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017; 114: 1740-1742
• 4 Levinson W, Lurie N. When most doctors are women: what lies ahead?. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 471-474
• 5 Percentage of First-year Fellows by Gender and Type of Medical School Attended 2020. Available from: https://www.abim.org/about/statistics-data/resident-fellow-workforce-data/first-year-fellows-by-gender-type-of-medical-school-attended.aspx
• 6 Hiba AA, Welsh DJ, Paramo JC. et al. 2018 ACS Governors Survey: Gender inequality and harassment remain a challenge in surgery. 2018 Available from: https://bulletin.facs.org/2019/09/2018-acs-governors-survey-gender-inequality-and-harassment-remain-a-challenge-in-surgery/
• 7 Abelson JS, Chartrand G, Moo TA. et al. The climb to break the glass ceiling in surgery: trends in women progressing from medical school to surgical training and academic leadership from 1994 to 2015. Am J Surg 2016; 212: 566-72 e1
• 8 McDonagh KJ, Hoss MAK. et al. The leadership gap: ensuring effective healthcare leadership requires inclusion of women at the top. Open J Leadership 2014; 3: 20-29
• 9 Granato CM, Kaul V, Kothari T. et al. Career prospects and professional landscape after advanced endoscopy fellowship training: a survey assessing graduates from 2009 to 2013. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 266-271
• 10 Wah TM, Belli AM. The Interventional radiology (IR) gender gap: a prospective online survey by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41: 1241-1253
• 11 Yong CM, Abnousi F, Rzeszut AK. et al. Sex differences in the pursuit of interventional cardiology as a subspecialty among cardiovascular fellows-in-training. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12: 219-228
• 12 Perez YV, Kesselman A, Abbey-Mensah G. et al. A glance at gender-specific preferences influencing interventional radiology selection. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27: 142-3 e1
• 13 Society of Interventional Radiology Safety Kit: Society of Interventional Radiology. Available from: https://www.sirweb.org/practice-resources/toolkits/quality-and-safety-toolkit/radiation-safety
• 14 Fincham JE. Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the Journal. Am J Pharm Educ 2008; 72: 43
• 15 Rembacken BJ, Dixon S, Albuquerque A. et al. Barriers and bias standing in the way of female trainees wanting to learn advanced endoscopy. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7: 1141-1145