Download PDF
Synthesis 2003(8): 1262-1266
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-39405
PAPER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Selective Conversion of N-Trichloroethoxycarbonyl (Troc) Groups into N-Acetyl Groups in the Presence of N-tert-Butoxycarbonyl (Boc) Protecting Groups

Xiangming Zhu, Richard R. Schmidt*
Fachbereich Chemie, Universität Konstanz, Fach M 725, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
Fax: +49(7531)883135; e-Mail: Richard.Schmidt@uni-konstanz.de ;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 19 February 2003
Publication Date:
26 May 2003 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Deprotection of N-trichloroethoxycarbonyl (Troc) groups with zinc in acetic anhydride cleaves also N-tert-butoxycarbonyl (Boc) groups, thus liberating the amino groups, which are immediately N-acetylated. When this reaction is performed in the presence of triethylamine only Troc groups are selectively cleaved as demonstrated for several examples.

Key words

protecting groups - orthogonality - cleavage - zinc - amines

    References

  • 1a Green TW. Wuts PGM. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis   3rd ed.:  Wiley; New York: 1991.  p.42 
    Google Scholar
  • 1b Kocienski PJ. Protecting Groups   Georg Thieme Verlag; Stuttgart: 1994. 
    Google Scholar
  • For some recent examples of the use of the N-Troc group as protecting group in the synthesis of amino sugar derivatives:
  • 2a Dullenkopf W. Castro-Palomino JC. Manzoni L. Schmidt RR. Carbohydr. Res.  1996,  296:  135 
    Google Scholar
  • 2b Saha UK. Schmidt RR. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1  1997,  1855 
    Google Scholar
  • 2c Fukase K. Fukase Y. Oikawa M. Liu W. Suda Y. Kusumoto S. Tetrahedron  1998,  54:  4033 
    Google Scholar
  • 2d Ellervik U. Magnusson G. Tetrahedron Lett.  1997,  38:  1627 ; and references cited therein
    Google Scholar
  • 2e Mitchell SA. Pratt MR. Hruby VJ. Polt R. J. Org. Chem.  2001,  61:  2327 
    Google Scholar
  • 2f Mong KT. Wong CH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2002,  41:  4087;   Angew. Chem.  2002,  114:  4261 
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Dong Q. Anderson CE. Ciufolini MA. Tetrahedron Lett.  1995,  36:  5681 ; and references cited therein
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Woodward RB. Heusler K. Gosteli J. Naegeli P. Oppolzer W. Ramage R. Ranganathan S. Vorbrüggen H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1966,  88:  852 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Just G. Grozinger K. Synthesis  1976,  457 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Castro-Palomino JC. Ph.D. Thesis   University of Konstanz; Germany: 1998. 
    Google Scholar
  • For examples, see:
  • 7a Hale KJ. Cai J. Chem. Commun.  1997,  2319 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7b Hancock G. Galpin IJ. Morgan BA. Tetrahedron Lett.  1982,  23:  249 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Nigam SC. Mann A. Taddei M. Wermuth CG. Synth. Commun.  1989,  19:  3139 
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Kovács L. Hesse M. Helv. Chim. Acta.  1992,  75:  1909 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Luebke K. Schroeder E. Liebigs Ann. Chem.  1966,  692:  237 
    Google Scholar