Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2328-3091
Post-Ugi Acid-Catalyzed Fragmentation and Trapping: An Unprecedented Approach towards Novel Bis(indolyl)acetamides
R.B.B. and S.R.D. are grateful to the Government of Gujarat for financial support under a SHODH fellowship (File Nos. KCG/SHODH/2023-24/202201733 and KCG/SHODH/2023-24/2022017310).
This article is dedicated to Professor Anamik K. Shah on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
Abstract
An unprecedented post-Ugi Brønsted acid catalyzed fragmentation followed by in situ trapping of the alkylideneindolenine intermediate by indole nucleophiles was developed to furnish novel bis(indolyl)acetamides. The amide fragment formed during this acid-catalyzed fragmentation of the Ugi adduct was also isolated and characterized. The carboxylic acid and amine components of the Ugi reaction were carefully chosen to permit a simple water wash for the removal of the amide fragment to obtain the desired bis(indolyl)acetamides in a pure form.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2328-3091.
- Supporting Information
Publication History
Received: 18 April 2024
Accepted after revision: 15 May 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
15 May 2024
Article published online:
28 May 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1a Dömling A, Ugi I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000; 39: 3168
- 1b Ramón DJ, Yus M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 1602
- 1c Ruijter E, Scheffelaar R, Orru RV. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 6234
- 1d de Graaff C, Ruijter E, Orru RV. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 3969
- 1e Brauch S, van Berkela SS, Westermann B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013; 42: 4948
- 1f Rotstein BH, Zaretsky S, Rai V, Yudin AK. Chem. Rev. 2014; 114: 8323
- 2a Banfi L, Basso A, Lambruschini C, Moni L, Riva R. Chem. Sci. 2021; 12: 15445
- 2b Bhoraniya RB, Koladiya M, Desai SR, Modha SG. Tetrahedron 2023; 148: 133683
- 3 Ugi I, Meyr R, Fetzer U, Steinbrückner C. Angew. Chem. 1959; 71: 386
- 4a Gilley C, Buller M, Kobayashi Y. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 3631
- 4b Ghandi M, Zarezadeh N, Taheri A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 3353
- 4c Kłossowski S, Wiraszka B, Berłożecki S, Ostaszewski R. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 566
- 4d Yang B, Zhao Y, Wei Y, Fu C, Tao L. Polym. Chem. 2015; 6: 8233
- 4e Chandgude AL, Dömling A. Org. Lett. 2017; 19: 1228
- 4f Rocha RO, Rodrigues MO, Neto BA. D. ACS Omega 2020; 5: 972
- 4g Tripolitsiotis NP, Thomaidi M, Neochoritis CG. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 6525
- 4h Fouad MA, Abdel-Hamid H, Ayoup MS. RSC Adv. 2020; 10: 42644
- 4i Xu S, Cui S. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 5197
- 5a Tsirulnikov S, Nikulnikov M, Kysil V, Ivachtchenko A, Krasavin M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 5529
- 5b El Kaïm L, Grimaud L, Wagschal S. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 5343
- 5c Welsch SJ, Umkehrer M, Ross G, Kolb J, Burdack C, Wessjohann LA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 6295
- 5d Modha SG, Kumar A, Vachhani DD, Jacobs J, Sharma SK, Parmar VS, Van Meervelt L, Van der Eycken EV. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012; 51: 9572
- 5e Sharma UK, Sharma N, Vachhani DD, Van der Eycken EV. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015; 44: 1836
- 5f Bariwal J, Kaur R, Voskressensky L, Van der Eycken EV. Front. Chem. (Lausanne, Switz.) 2018; 6: 557
- 5g Srinivasulu V, Sieburth SM, El-Awady R, Kariem NM, Tarazi H, O’Connor MJ, Al-Tel TH. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 836
- 5h Zaman M, Hasan M, Peshkov AA, Van Hecke K, Van der Eycken EV, Pereshivko OP, Peshkova VA. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020; 362: 261
- 5i Lei J, Song G.-T, He L.-J, Luo Y.-F, Tang D.-Y, Lin H.-K, Frett B, Li H.-y, Chen Z.-Z, Xu Z.-G. Chem. Commun. 2020; 56: 2194
- 5j Ghoshal A, Ambule MD, Yadav A, Srivastava AK. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2021; 10: 315
- 5k Song L, Cai L, Van der Eycken EV. Molecules 2022; 27: 3105
- 5l Ambule MD, Bhumij M, Kumar A, Kant R, Srivastava AK. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2023; 26: e202201293
- 6a Silveira CC, Mendes SR, Líbero FM, Lenardão EJ, Perin G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 6060
- 6b Shiri M, Zolfigol MA, Kruger HG, Tanbakouchian Z. Chem. Rev. 2010; 110: 2250
- 6c Mendes SR, Thurow S, Fortes MP, Penteado F, Lenardão EJ, Alves D, Perin G, Jacob RG. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012; 53: 5402
- 6d Mulla SA. R, Sudalai A, Pathan MY, Siddique SA, Inamdar SM, Chavan SS, Reddy RS. RSC Adv. 2012; 2: 3525
- 6e Praveena PJ, Parameswaran PS, Majik MS. Synthesis 2015; 47: 1827
- 6f Kalla RM. N, Hong SC, Kim I. ACS Omega 2018; 3: 2242
- 6g Tanemura K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2021; 82: 153391
- 7a Zheng B.-H, Ding C.-H, Hou X.-L, Dai L.-X. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 1688
- 7b Matsuzaki K, Furukawa T, Tokunaga E, Matsumoto T, Shiro M, Shibata N. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 3282
- 7c Luo J, Wu B, Chen M.-W, Jiang G.-F, Zhou Y.-G. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 2578
- 7d Yuan L, Palmieri A, Petrini M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020; 362: 1509
- 7e Ge L, Zurro M, Harutyunyan S. 2020; 26: 16277
- 7f Kaur BP, Kaur J, Chimni SS. RSC Adv. 2021; 11: 2126
- 8a Kumar A, Vachhani DD, Modha SG, Sharma SK, Parmar VS, Van der Eycken EV. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013; 9: 2097
- 8b Kumar A, Vachhani DD, Modha SG, Sharma SK, Parmar VS, Van der Eycken EV. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 2288
- 8c Kumar A, Vachhani DD, Modha SG, Sharma SK, Parmar VS, Van der Eycken EV. Synthesis 2013; 45: 2571
- 8d Vachhani DD, Kumar A, Modha SG, Sharma SK, Parmar VS, Van der Eycken EV. Synthesis 2015; 47: 1337
- 8e Bhoraniya RB, Modha SG. ChemistryOpen 2023; 12: e202200223
- 9 de la Hoz A, Díaz-Ortiz A, Gómez MV, Mayoral JA, Moreno A, Sánchez-Migallón AM, Vázquez E. Tetrahedron 2001; 57: 5421
- 10 Amides 8a–h; General Procedure The appropriate Ugi adduct (1 equiv) and substituted indole (1 equiv) were treated with 30 mol% HCl in MeOH at rt until the reaction was complete (TLC, hexane–EtOAc, 7:3). The mixture was then poured into crushed ice and stirred for 5–10 min. The solid that separated was collected by filtration, washed with ice-cold H2O, and purified by column chromatography. N-(tert-Butyl)-2,2-di-1H-indol-3-ylacetamide (8a) Prepared according to the general procedure from Ugi adduct 5e (0.377 g, 1 mmol, 1 equiv) and indole (0.117 g, 1 mmol, 1 equiv) to give a light-orange solid; yield: 0.297 g (86%); mp 140–142 °C; TLC Rf = 0.4 (EtOAc–hexane, 3:7; UV). IR (ATR): 3393, 3073, 2963, 1650, 1514, 1454, 1417, 1392, 1362, 1337, 1216, 1095, 1009, 792, 739 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.3 (s, 2 H), 7.5 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.25–7.23 (m, 2 H), 7.1 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.0 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.6 (s, 2 H), 5.9 (s, 1 H), 5.1 (s, 1 H), 1.2 (s, 9 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 172.4, 136.5, 126.6, 123.8, 121.9, 119.4, 119.1, 114.2, 111.5, 51.3, 43.7, 28.6. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C22H23N3NaO: 368.1739; found: 368.1769.